Alhassan S, Kim S, Bersamin A, King A C, Gardner C D
Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-9258, USA.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jun;32(6):985-91. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.8. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
Dietary adherence has been implicated as an important factor in the success of dieting strategies; however, studies assessing and investigating its association with weight loss success are scarce.
We aimed to document the level of dietary adherence using measured diet data and to examine its association with weight loss success.
Secondary analysis was performed using data from 181 free-living overweight/obese women (mean+/-s.d. age=43+/-5 years, body mass index=31+/-4 kg m(-2)) participating in a 1-year randomized clinical trial (the A TO Z study) comparing popular weight loss diets (Atkins, Zone and Ornish). Participants' dietary adherence was assessed as the difference between their respective assigned diet's recommended macronutrient goals and their self-reported intake. Association between dietary adherence and 12-month weight change was computed using Spearman's correlations. Differences in baseline characteristics and macronutrient intake between the most and least adherent tertiles for diet groups were compared using t-tests.
Within each diet group, adherence score was significantly correlated with 12-month weight change (Atkins, r(s)=0.42, P=0.0003; Zone, r(s)=0.34, P=0.009 and Ornish, r(s)=0.38, P=0.004). Twelve-month weight change in the most vs least adherent tertiles, respectively, was -8.3+/-5.6 vs -1.9+/-5.8 kg, P=0.0006 (Atkins); -3.7+/-6.3 vs -0.4+/-6.8 kg, P=0.12 (Zone) and -6.5+/-6.8 vs -1.7+/-7.9 kg, P=0.06 (Ornish).
Regardless of assigned diet groups, 12-month weight change was greater in the most adherent compared to the least adherent tertiles. These results suggest that strategies to increase adherence may deserve more emphasis than the specific macronutrient composition of the weight loss diet itself in supporting successful weight loss.
饮食依从性被认为是节食策略成功的一个重要因素;然而,评估和研究其与减肥成功之间关联的研究却很匮乏。
我们旨在利用实测饮食数据记录饮食依从性水平,并检验其与减肥成功之间的关联。
采用来自181名自由生活的超重/肥胖女性(平均年龄±标准差=43±5岁,体重指数=31±4 kg/m²)的数据进行二次分析,这些女性参与了一项为期1年的随机临床试验(A到Z研究),该试验比较了流行的减肥饮食(阿特金斯饮食、区域饮食和奥尼什饮食)。参与者的饮食依从性通过各自指定饮食的推荐宏量营养素目标与自我报告摄入量之间的差异来评估。使用斯皮尔曼相关性计算饮食依从性与12个月体重变化之间的关联。使用t检验比较饮食组中依从性最高和最低三分位数在基线特征和宏量营养素摄入量方面的差异。
在每个饮食组中,依从性得分与12个月体重变化显著相关(阿特金斯饮食,r(s)=0.42,P=0.0003;区域饮食,r(s)=0.34,P=0.009;奥尼什饮食,r(s)=0.38,P=0.004)。依从性最高和最低三分位数的12个月体重变化分别为-8.3±5.6 kg和-1.9±5.8 kg,P=0.0006(阿特金斯饮食);-3.7±6.3 kg和-0.4±6.8 kg,P=0.12(区域饮食);-6.5±6.8 kg和-1.7±7.9 kg,P=0.06(奥尼什饮食)。
无论分配到哪个饮食组,依从性最高的三分位数的12个月体重变化都大于依从性最低的三分位数。这些结果表明,在支持成功减肥方面,提高依从性的策略可能比减肥饮食本身的特定宏量营养素组成更值得强调。