Monticelli Francesca, Osorio Raquel, Tay Franklin R, Sadek Fernanda T, Ferrari Marco, Toledano Manuel
Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain.
Am J Dent. 2007 Dec;20(6):416-20.
To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of different coupling agents used in fiber post-composite bonds to withstand different in vitro challenging procedures.
63 fiber posts (DT Light Post) etched with 10% hydrogen peroxide were divided into three groups according to the silane/adhesive system applied: (1) Porcelain Bond Activator (PBA) + Clearfil SE Bond; (2) PBA + Clearfil Tri S Bond; (3) Monobond-S. A composite build-up (Clearfil AP-X) was performed around the post producing cylindrical specimens that were divided into three subgroups according to the different aging protocol: (1) 24-hour storage at room temperature; (2) Thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5 degrees/55 degrees C dwell time: 30 seconds); (3) Cyclic loading (45 degrees angle, 20,000 cycles, load 5-50 N at 3.0 Hz). Samples were then cut obtaining sticks that were loaded in tension until failure. Bond strength values were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). Failure mode was recorded and the morphologic aspect of post/core interface after aging was evaluated under SEM.
Both post superficial treatment, thermocycling and cyclic loading influenced bond strength. After 24 hours, samples treated with silane/adhesive couplings attained higher MTBS than those bonded with conventional silane. No significant differences in the microtensile bond strength at the post/core interface were recorded between the different silane/adhesive couplings. After challenging, no differences were found between the tested groups.
评估用于纤维桩 - 复合材料粘结的不同偶联剂的微拉伸粘结强度(MTBS),以承受不同的体外挑战性程序。
将63根用10%过氧化氢蚀刻的纤维桩(DT Light Post)根据所应用的硅烷/粘结剂系统分为三组:(1)瓷粘结活化剂(PBA)+ Clearfil SE粘结剂;(2)PBA + Clearfil Tri S粘结剂;(3)Monobond - S。在桩周围进行复合树脂堆积(Clearfil AP - X),制成圆柱形试件,根据不同的老化方案分为三个亚组:(1)室温下储存24小时;(2)热循环(5000次循环,5℃/55℃ dwell时间:30秒);(3)循环加载(45度角,20000次循环,3.0赫兹下5 - 50 N加载)。然后将样品切割成棒状,进行拉伸加载直至破坏。粘结强度值采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。记录破坏模式,并在扫描电子显微镜下评估老化后桩/核界面的形态学特征。
桩表面处理、热循环和循环加载均影响粘结强度。24小时后,用硅烷/粘结剂偶联剂处理的样品获得的MTBS高于用传统硅烷粘结的样品。不同硅烷/粘结剂偶联剂之间在桩/核界面的微拉伸粘结强度上没有显著差异。经过挑战性试验后,测试组之间没有发现差异。