Lin Philana Ling, Yee JoAnn, Klein Edwin, Lerche Nicholas W
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Med Primatol. 2008 Feb;37 Suppl 1:44-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2007.00261.x.
Accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis in non-human primates is of critical importance. As with natural human infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, infected primates develop a broad spectrum of disease, including subclinical (latent) infection, chronic primary tuberculosis, rapidly progressing fulminant disease, and reactivation tuberculosis. In a primate colony, clinical suspicion is the key to diagnosis. The course of action should be based on careful and thorough clinical assessments in conjunction with screening and microbiologic methods. Diagnostic modalities can be categorized into pathogen identification and immunologic host response techniques. While the classic tuberculin skin test is the standard screening tool, it has limited sensitivity and specificity. Other tools such as interferon gamma releasing assays have similar accuracy results but use different immunologic mechanisms and may be helpful as an additional screening tool. Advantages and disadvantages to these and other assays (e.g., lymphocyte proliferation assay, antibody detection) are also discussed. Surrogates to sputum sample (e.g., gastric aspirate, stool samples, respiratory sample via bronchoscopy) should be obtained for microbiologic identification, as acid-fast smear and culture are critical to pathogen identification for optimal sensitivity and specificity. Interpretation of these immunologic screening tools should be performed cautiously and must be correlated with level of suspicion. While the identification of M. tuberculosis or M. bovis confirms the diagnosis of tuberculosis, negative results do not exclude the diagnosis. Without pathogen detection to confirm diagnosis, thorough gross and microscopic pathological review at necropsy may be required to make a definitive diagnosis. Lastly, the risk and benefits to the primate colony, staff and resources must be carefully weighed when deciding to euthanize monkeys to make the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
准确诊断非人灵长类动物的结核病至关重要。与人类自然感染结核分枝杆菌一样,受感染的灵长类动物会出现广泛的疾病,包括亚临床(潜伏)感染、慢性原发性结核病、迅速进展的暴发性疾病和复发性结核病。在灵长类动物群体中,临床怀疑是诊断的关键。行动方案应基于仔细和全面的临床评估,并结合筛查和微生物学方法。诊断方法可分为病原体鉴定和免疫宿主反应技术。虽然经典的结核菌素皮肤试验是标准的筛查工具,但其敏感性和特异性有限。其他工具,如干扰素γ释放试验,具有相似的准确性结果,但使用不同的免疫机制,可能作为额外的筛查工具有所帮助。还讨论了这些及其他检测方法(如淋巴细胞增殖试验、抗体检测)的优缺点。应获取痰样本的替代样本(如胃吸出物、粪便样本、经支气管镜检查的呼吸道样本)进行微生物鉴定,因为抗酸涂片和培养对于病原体鉴定以获得最佳敏感性和特异性至关重要。这些免疫筛查工具的解读应谨慎进行,并且必须与怀疑程度相关联。虽然鉴定出结核分枝杆菌或牛分枝杆菌可确诊结核病,但阴性结果并不排除诊断。如果没有病原体检测来确诊,可能需要在尸检时进行全面的大体和显微镜病理检查以做出明确诊断。最后,在决定对猴子实施安乐死以诊断结核病时,必须仔细权衡对灵长类动物群体、工作人员和资源的风险与益处。