Suppr超能文献

克拉霉素与氨苄西林治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌性加重门诊患者的比较。

A comparison of clarithromycin with ampicillin in the treatment of outpatients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Aldons P M

机构信息

Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27 Suppl A:101-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_a.101.

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-five outpatients with clinical symptoms of an acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were enrolled in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of oral clarithromycin and ampicillin. Only those patients presenting with pathogens cultured from pre-treatment specimens susceptible to both study drugs were included in the study; beta-lactamase producing strains were excluded. Sixty patients received clarithromycin 250 mg 12-hourly and 65 had ampicillin 250 mg 6-hourly for 7-14 days. Clinical and bacteriological evaluations were performed pre-treatment, during treatment, and post-treatment within 48 h of cessation of therapy. All adverse events reported were evaluated. Twenty patients from the clarithromycin group and 24 from the ampicillin group were withdrawn from the study when no pathogen was isolated from the pre-treatment specimens. Twenty-eight patients who received clarithromycin and 23 who received ampicillin were evaluable for clinical and bacteriological efficacy. Both treatment groups were similar with respect to clinical and bacteriological response rates. The clinical cure rate for clarithromycin was 96% (27/28) compared with 91% (21/23) for the ampicillin group. Clarithromycin achieved a bacteriological cure rate of 96% (27/28) compared with 100% (23/23) for the ampicillin group. Adverse events, which were generally mild and associated with the digestive system, were reported by 11.7% of patients receiving clarithromycin and 1.5% of patients receiving ampicillin. Adverse events caused two patients in each group to discontinue treatment. Laboratory profiles for both groups were unremarkable throughout treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

125例有慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染临床症状的门诊患者参与了一项多中心、双盲、随机临床试验,以比较口服克拉霉素和氨苄西林的疗效及安全性。只有那些治疗前标本培养出的病原体对两种研究药物均敏感的患者被纳入研究;产β-内酰胺酶菌株被排除。60例患者每12小时口服250mg克拉霉素,65例患者每6小时口服250mg氨苄西林,疗程7 - 14天。在治疗前、治疗期间以及治疗停止后48小时内进行临床和细菌学评估。对所有报告的不良事件进行了评估。当治疗前标本未分离出病原体时,克拉霉素组20例患者和氨苄西林组24例患者退出研究。28例接受克拉霉素治疗的患者和23例接受氨苄西林治疗的患者可进行临床和细菌学疗效评估。两个治疗组在临床和细菌学反应率方面相似。克拉霉素的临床治愈率为96%(27/28),氨苄西林组为91%(21/23)。克拉霉素的细菌学治愈率为96%(27/28),氨苄西林组为100%(23/23)。接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中有11.7%报告了不良事件,接受氨苄西林治疗的患者中有1.5%报告了不良事件,不良事件一般较轻,与消化系统有关。每组均有2例患者因不良事件停止治疗。两组在整个治疗过程中的实验室检查结果均无异常。(摘要截选于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验