• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地红霉素5天与克拉霉素7天治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较

A comparison of 5 days of dirithromycin and 7 days of clarithromycin in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Hosie J, Quinn P, Smits P, Sides G

机构信息

Health Centre, Sligo, Ireland.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36(1):173-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.1.173.

DOI:10.1093/jac/36.1.173
PMID:8537264
Abstract

The safety and efficacy of dirithromycin and clarithromycin were compared in a single-blind, multicentre study of patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Patients received either dirithromycin, 500 mg once daily for 5 days, or clarithromycin, 250 mg twice daily for 7 days. A total of 212 patients entered the study, of whom 191 qualified for efficacy analysis. Favourable post-therapy clinical and bacteriological response rates for qualified patients (95 dirithromycin and 96 clarithromycin) were similar: 89.5% and 68.8% for dirithromycin vs 94.8% and 71.9% for clarithromycin. At late post-therapy evaluation, favourable clinical and bacteriological response rates were achieved in 98.8% and 96.2% of dirithromycin patients and 95.3% and 93.3% of clarithromycin patients, respectively. These differences were neither statistically nor clinically significantly different. Both drugs had similar efficacy against Haemophilus influenzae and both were well tolerated. Dirithromycin, administered as a single daily dose for just 5 days resulted in complete compliance in all but four patients. In clarithromycin-treated patients, requiring a 7-day course of twice-daily treatment, compliance was less satisfactory, with 12 patients failing to comply, though the between-group difference was not statistically significant. It can be concluded that 5 days of dirithromycin, 500 mg once daily is as safe and effective as 7 days of clarithromycin, 250 mg, twice daily in the treatment of AECB.

摘要

在一项针对慢性支气管炎急性细菌性加重(AECB)患者的单盲、多中心研究中,比较了地红霉素和克拉霉素的安全性和有效性。患者分别接受地红霉素(每日一次,500mg,共5天)或克拉霉素(每日两次,250mg,共7天)治疗。共有212名患者进入研究,其中191名符合疗效分析标准。符合标准的患者(95名接受地红霉素治疗,96名接受克拉霉素治疗)治疗后良好的临床和细菌学反应率相似:地红霉素组为89.5%和68.8%,克拉霉素组为94.8%和71.9%。在治疗后期评估中,地红霉素组分别有98.8%和96.2%的患者获得了良好的临床和细菌学反应率,克拉霉素组分别为95.3%和93.3%。这些差异在统计学和临床上均无显著意义。两种药物对流感嗜血杆菌的疗效相似,且耐受性良好。地红霉素每日单剂量给药仅5天,除4名患者外,所有患者均完全依从。在接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中,需要每日两次给药7天,依从性较差,有12名患者未依从,尽管组间差异无统计学意义。可以得出结论,在治疗AECB方面,每日一次500mg的地红霉素治疗5天与每日两次250mg的克拉霉素治疗7天一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
A comparison of 5 days of dirithromycin and 7 days of clarithromycin in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素5天与克拉霉素7天治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36(1):173-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.1.173.
2
A multicentre study comparing the safety and efficacy of dirithromycin with erythromycin in the treatment of bronchitis.一项比较地红霉素与红霉素治疗支气管炎安全性和有效性的多中心研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:139-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.139.
3
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:131-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.131.
4
Five-day dirithromycin therapy is as effective as seven-day erythromycin therapy for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.对于慢性支气管炎急性加重期,五日地红霉素疗法与七日红霉素疗法疗效相当。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Apr;43(4):541-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.4.541.
5
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin versus miocamycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与米卡霉素治疗急性支气管炎或慢性支气管炎急性加重的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:153-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.153.
6
Comparative study of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的对比研究
J Chemother. 1999 Apr;11(2):119-25. doi: 10.1179/joc.1999.11.2.119.
7
A comparison of 5-day courses of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.地红霉素与阿奇霉素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的5日疗程比较
Clin Ther. 2003 Feb;25(2):542-57. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80095-4.
8
New drugs--reports of new drugs recently approved by the FDA. Dirithromycin.新药——美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)近期批准的新药报告。地红霉素。
Bioorg Med Chem. 1996 Apr;4(4):521-2. doi: 10.1016/0968-0896(96)00052-1.
9
A comparison of gemifloxacin and clarithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and long-term clinical outcomes.吉米沙星与克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的比较及长期临床疗效
Clin Ther. 2002 Apr;24(4):639-52. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85139-6.
10
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin in pneumonia.地红霉素治疗肺炎的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:121-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.121.

引用本文的文献

1
Compliance with once-daily versus twice or thrice-daily administration of antibiotic regimens: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.抗生素治疗方案每日一次给药与每日两次或三次给药的依从性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 5;10(1):e0116207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116207. eCollection 2015.
2
Short-course antimicrobial therapy of respiratory tract infections.呼吸道感染的短程抗菌治疗。
Drugs. 2003;63(20):2169-84. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363200-00002.
3
Review of macrolides and ketolides: focus on respiratory tract infections.
大环内酯类和酮内酯类药物综述:聚焦呼吸道感染
Drugs. 2001;61(4):443-98. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161040-00003.
4
Randomized comparison of once-daily ceftibuten and twice-daily clarithromycin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.每日一次头孢布烯与每日两次克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的随机对照研究
Infection. 1998 Jan-Feb;26(1):68-75. doi: 10.1007/BF02768764.
5
Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients.克拉霉素。免疫功能正常患者呼吸道感染治疗中其疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1997 Jun;53(6):973-1004. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753060-00006.
6
Dirithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.地红霉素。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1994 Oct;48(4):599-616. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448040-00008.