Suppr超能文献

克拉霉素与罗红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的对比研究

Comparative study of clarithromycin and roxithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Poirier R

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier d'Aix-en-Provence, France.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27 Suppl A:109-16. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_a.109.

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerance of clarithromycin (250 mg twice daily) were compared with those of roxithromycin (150 mg twice daily) in an open, multicentre trial of 77 inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. Sixty-five patients were clinically evaluable (34, clarithromycin; 31 roxithromycin). Efficacy was comparable between treatment groups: 26 of 34 patients (76%) treated with clarithromycin were clinically cured, including four with atypical pneumonia. In the roxithromycin group 25 of 31 patients (81%) were clinically cured and one was improved. Cough, appearance of sputum, and fever improved in most patients in both treatment groups. Chest X-rays after treatment showed resolution or improvement in 76% of patients who received clarithromycin and 87% of those who received roxithromycin. The clinical evaluation of the response generally agreed with the bacteriological response. Among patients who were bacteriologically evaluable for four target organisms (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, H. parainfluenzae, and Branhamella catarrhalis) the pathogen was eradicated in four of seven (57%) in the clarithromycin-treated group and in five of six (83%) in the roxithromycin-treated group. Adverse events were reported in more patients who received roxithromycin (21.6%) than in those who received clarithromycin (12.5%) although the incidences were not statistically significantly different. The majority of adverse events were transient increases in serum alanine aminotransferase, serum aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase. Clarithromycin was shown to be effective and well-tolerated; the clinical efficacy and safety of clarithromycin and roxithromycin were comparable.

摘要

在一项针对77例社区获得性肺炎住院患者的开放性多中心试验中,比较了克拉霉素(每日2次,每次250mg)与罗红霉素(每日2次,每次150mg)的疗效和耐受性。65例患者可进行临床评估(34例使用克拉霉素;31例使用罗红霉素)。治疗组之间疗效相当:34例接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中有26例(76%)临床治愈,其中包括4例非典型肺炎患者。罗红霉素组31例患者中有25例(81%)临床治愈,1例病情改善。两个治疗组的大多数患者咳嗽、痰液性状及发热情况均有改善。治疗后胸部X线检查显示,接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中有76%病变消散或改善,接受罗红霉素治疗的患者中有87%病变消散或改善。对反应的临床评估总体上与细菌学反应一致。在对四种目标病原体(肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、副流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌)进行细菌学评估的患者中,克拉霉素治疗组7例中有4例(57%)病原体被清除,罗红霉素治疗组6例中有5例(83%)病原体被清除。报告的不良事件在接受罗红霉素治疗的患者中(21.6%)比接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中(12.5%)更多,尽管发生率无统计学显著差异。大多数不良事件为血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶、血清天冬氨酸氨基转移酶和碱性磷酸酶短暂升高。结果表明克拉霉素有效且耐受性良好;克拉霉素和罗红霉素的临床疗效和安全性相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验