• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克拉霉素与罗红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的对比研究

Comparative study of clarithromycin and roxithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Poirier R

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier d'Aix-en-Provence, France.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27 Suppl A:109-16. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_a.109.

DOI:10.1093/jac/27.suppl_a.109
PMID:1827096
Abstract

The efficacy and tolerance of clarithromycin (250 mg twice daily) were compared with those of roxithromycin (150 mg twice daily) in an open, multicentre trial of 77 inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. Sixty-five patients were clinically evaluable (34, clarithromycin; 31 roxithromycin). Efficacy was comparable between treatment groups: 26 of 34 patients (76%) treated with clarithromycin were clinically cured, including four with atypical pneumonia. In the roxithromycin group 25 of 31 patients (81%) were clinically cured and one was improved. Cough, appearance of sputum, and fever improved in most patients in both treatment groups. Chest X-rays after treatment showed resolution or improvement in 76% of patients who received clarithromycin and 87% of those who received roxithromycin. The clinical evaluation of the response generally agreed with the bacteriological response. Among patients who were bacteriologically evaluable for four target organisms (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, H. parainfluenzae, and Branhamella catarrhalis) the pathogen was eradicated in four of seven (57%) in the clarithromycin-treated group and in five of six (83%) in the roxithromycin-treated group. Adverse events were reported in more patients who received roxithromycin (21.6%) than in those who received clarithromycin (12.5%) although the incidences were not statistically significantly different. The majority of adverse events were transient increases in serum alanine aminotransferase, serum aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase. Clarithromycin was shown to be effective and well-tolerated; the clinical efficacy and safety of clarithromycin and roxithromycin were comparable.

摘要

在一项针对77例社区获得性肺炎住院患者的开放性多中心试验中,比较了克拉霉素(每日2次,每次250mg)与罗红霉素(每日2次,每次150mg)的疗效和耐受性。65例患者可进行临床评估(34例使用克拉霉素;31例使用罗红霉素)。治疗组之间疗效相当:34例接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中有26例(76%)临床治愈,其中包括4例非典型肺炎患者。罗红霉素组31例患者中有25例(81%)临床治愈,1例病情改善。两个治疗组的大多数患者咳嗽、痰液性状及发热情况均有改善。治疗后胸部X线检查显示,接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中有76%病变消散或改善,接受罗红霉素治疗的患者中有87%病变消散或改善。对反应的临床评估总体上与细菌学反应一致。在对四种目标病原体(肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、副流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌)进行细菌学评估的患者中,克拉霉素治疗组7例中有4例(57%)病原体被清除,罗红霉素治疗组6例中有5例(83%)病原体被清除。报告的不良事件在接受罗红霉素治疗的患者中(21.6%)比接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中(12.5%)更多,尽管发生率无统计学显著差异。大多数不良事件为血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶、血清天冬氨酸氨基转移酶和碱性磷酸酶短暂升高。结果表明克拉霉素有效且耐受性良好;克拉霉素和罗红霉素的临床疗效和安全性相当。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of clarithromycin and roxithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.克拉霉素与罗红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的对比研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27 Suppl A:109-16. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_a.109.
2
A comparative efficacy and safety study of clarithromycin, roxithromycin and erythromycin stearate in mild pneumonia.克拉霉素、罗红霉素和硬脂酸红霉素治疗轻度肺炎的疗效与安全性比较研究
Yonsei Med J. 2000 Jun;41(3):340-4. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2000.41.3.340.
3
A comparative safety and efficacy study of clarithromycin and erythromycin stearate in community-acquired pneumonia.克拉霉素与硬脂酸红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的安全性和疗效对比研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27 Suppl A:117-24. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_a.117.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of roxithromycin and clarithromycin in upper respiratory tract infections.罗红霉素与克拉霉素治疗上呼吸道感染的疗效及安全性比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 May-Jun;15(4 Suppl):119S-122S. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90138-j.
5
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin versus roxithromycin in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与罗红霉素治疗急性下呼吸道感染的疗效、安全性及耐受性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Jun;37 Suppl C:115-24. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_c.115.
6
Clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety of 5 and 7 day regimens of telithromycin once daily compared with a 10 day regimen of clarithromycin twice daily in patients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia.在患有轻至中度社区获得性肺炎的患者中,与每日两次服用10天克拉霉素的方案相比,每日一次服用5天和7天泰利霉素方案的临床、细菌学疗效及安全性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Aug;54(2):515-23. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh356. Epub 2004 Jul 21.
7
Comparison of roxithromycin with cefixime in the treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Mar;41 Suppl B:75-80. doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.75.
8
Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infection.阿奇霉素与克拉霉素治疗下呼吸道感染患者的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:153-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.153.
9
Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin versus josamycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with bacterial pneumonia.克拉霉素与交沙霉素治疗住院细菌性肺炎患者的疗效及安全性比较
J Int Med Res. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):164-70. doi: 10.1177/030006059001800211.
10
Efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.罗红霉素与克拉霉素治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效及耐受性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Mar;41 Suppl B:69-73. doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.69.

引用本文的文献

1
Determination of the Postexposure Prophylactic Benefit of Oral Azithromycin and Clarithromycin Against Inhalation Anthrax in Cynomolgus Macaques.测定口服阿奇霉素和克拉霉素对食蟹猴吸入性炭疽的暴露后预防益处。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 17;75(Suppl 3):S411-S416. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac569.
2
The use of macrolides in respiratory tract infections.大环内酯类药物在呼吸道感染中的应用。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1993 Nov;3 Suppl 1:S53-61. doi: 10.1016/0924-8579(93)90035-4.
3
Comparison of Clarithromycin and Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in an Era of Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.
比较耐药肺炎链球菌流行时期的克拉霉素和阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗社区获得性肺炎的效果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(8):491-501. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323080-00001.
4
BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults.英国胸科学会成人社区获得性肺炎管理指南
Thorax. 2001 Dec;56 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):IV1-64. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.suppl_4.iv1.
5
Formulary management of macrolide antibiotics.大环内酯类抗生素的处方集管理
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Dec;8(6):491-512. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508060-00005.
6
Comparison of cefdinir and cefaclor in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.头孢地尼与头孢克洛治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Jul;41(7):1579-83. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.7.1579.
7
Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients.克拉霉素。免疫功能正常患者呼吸道感染治疗中其疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1997 Jun;53(6):973-1004. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753060-00006.
8
Overview of the tolerability profile of clarithromycin in preclinical and clinical trials.克拉霉素在临床前和临床试验中的耐受性概况综述。
Drug Saf. 1993 May;8(5):350-64. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199308050-00003.
9
In vitro susceptibilities of spotted fever group rickettsiae and Coxiella burnetti to clarithromycin.斑点热群立克次体和伯氏考克斯氏体对克拉霉素的体外敏感性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Dec;37(12):2633-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.12.2633.
10
Intracellular concentrations of antibacterial agents and related clinical implications.抗菌药物的细胞内浓度及其相关临床意义。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994 Jul;27(1):63-84. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199427010-00006.