Kindberg S, Stehouwer M, Hvidman L, Henriksen T B
Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark.
BJOG. 2008 Mar;115(4):472-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01637.x.
To compare a continuous suture technique with interrupted stitches using inverted knots for postpartum perineal repair of second-degree lacerations and episiotomies.
A double-blind randomised controlled trial.
A Danish university hospital with more than 4800 deliveries annually.
A total of 400 healthy primiparous women with a vaginal delivery at term. METHOD Randomisation was computer-controlled. Structured interviews and systematic assessment of perineal healing were performed by research midwives blinded to treatment allocation at 24-48 hours, 10 days and 6 months postpartum. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Wound healing was evaluated using the REEDA scale and by assessment of gaping wounds >0.5 cm. Analysis complied with the intention-to-treat principle.
The primary outcome was perineal pain 10 days after delivery. Secondary outcomes were wound healing, patient satisfaction, dyspareunia, need for resuturing, time elapsed during repair and amount of suture material used.
A total of 400 women were randomised; 5 women withdrew their consent, leaving 395 for follow up. The follow-up rate was 98% for all assessments after delivery. No difference was seen in perineal pain 10 days after delivery. No difference was seen in wound healing, patient satisfaction, dyspareunia or need for resuturing. The continuous suture technique was significantly faster (15 versus 17 minutes, P = 0.03) and less suture material was used (one versus two packets, P < 0.01).
Interrupted, inverted stitches for perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured appear to be equivalent to the continuous suture technique in relation to perineal pain, wound healing, patient satisfaction, dyspareunia and need for resuturing. The continuous technique, however, is faster and requires less suture material, thus leaving it the more cost-effective of the two techniques evaluated.
比较连续缝合法与间断缝合法(采用内翻结)用于产后会阴Ⅱ度裂伤和会阴切开术修复的效果。
双盲随机对照试验。
丹麦一家年分娩量超过4800例的大学医院。
共400名足月阴道分娩的健康初产妇。方法随机化由计算机控制。由对治疗分配不知情的研究助产士在产后24 - 48小时、10天和6个月时进行结构化访谈和会阴愈合的系统评估。使用视觉模拟量表和麦吉尔疼痛问卷评估疼痛。使用REEDA量表并通过评估大于0.5 cm的裂开伤口来评估伤口愈合情况。分析遵循意向性治疗原则。
主要结局是产后10天的会阴疼痛。次要结局包括伤口愈合、患者满意度、性交困难、再次缝合的需求、修复过程所用时间以及缝线材料用量。
共400名女性被随机分组;5名女性撤回同意,395名女性接受随访。产后所有评估的随访率为98%。产后10天的会阴疼痛无差异。在伤口愈合、患者满意度、性交困难或再次缝合需求方面均无差异。连续缝合法明显更快(15分钟对17分钟,P = 0.03)且使用的缝线材料更少(1包对2包,P < 0.01)。
在会阴疼痛、伤口愈合、患者满意度性交困难和再次缝合需求方面,会阴修复采用间断内翻缝合法不缝合皮肤似乎与连续缝合法等效。然而,连续缝合法更快且所需缝线材料更少,因此是所评估的两种方法中更具成本效益的。