Williams G H
ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, Medical School, University of Manchester, England.
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(4):517-24. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90355-g.
Disablement from chronic illness presents medicine with a constant reminder of the limits to its therapeutic effectiveness, and challenges the political legitimacy of Welfare States. In this regard, chronic illness forms a crucial component of the 'crisis' in health care. In this paper I look at the different ways in which disablement stimulates this crisis--for medicine, for political economy, and for disabled people themselves. In looking at responses to the crisis I detect a certain reluctance, or inability, to move away from an atomistic perspective which underpins much of our thinking on health and social policy, and much else besides. I conclude by arguing, against post-modern cynics, that a reasoned defence of the Welfare State requires a broader concept of self-sufficiency and a perspective which both acknowledges the need for help, and recognizes the extent to which the provision of help may further disempower the disadvantaged.
慢性病导致的残疾不断提醒医学其治疗效果存在局限,也对福利国家的政治合法性构成挑战。在这方面,慢性病构成了医疗保健“危机”的关键部分。在本文中,我探讨了残疾引发这场危机的不同方式——对医学而言、对政治经济学而言以及对残疾人自身而言。在审视对危机的应对措施时,我发现人们在很大程度上仍不愿或无法摆脱支撑我们许多健康与社会政策思维以及诸多其他方面思维的原子主义视角。最后,我反驳后现代犬儒主义者,认为对福利国家进行合理辩护需要更宽泛的自给自足概念以及一种既承认需要帮助又认识到提供帮助可能在多大程度上进一步削弱弱势群体权能的视角。