• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左旋咪唑浇泼剂与左旋咪唑皮下注射剂对犊牛胎生网尾线虫感染的疗效比较

Efficacy of levamisole pour-on compared with levamisole subcutaneous injection against Dictyocaulus viviparus infection in calves.

作者信息

Vanparijs O, Quick J M

机构信息

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol. 1991 Jan;38(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(91)90011-j.

DOI:10.1016/0304-4017(91)90011-j
PMID:1827221
Abstract

The efficacy of levamisole pour-on against Dictyocaulus viviparus was compared to that of subcutaneous levamisole injection. Eighteen calves were raised individually and artifically infected with D. viviparus larvae. Faecal samples were collected 27 and 28 days later and larvae per gram (l.p.g.) determined. The animals were then divided into three comparable groups. Group 1 animals remained untreated as controls. Group 2 animals received levamisole 10% w/v subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 mg kg-1 and Group 3 received levamisole pour-on 20% w/v at a rate of 10 mg kg-1 applied transdermally. Results of l.p.g. measurements from faecal samples taken 7 and 8 days post-treatment indicated a dramatic reduction in the worm burden of animals in both treatment groups. Necropsies at 14 days post-treatment revealed few adult worms in these groups, indicating a 99 and 98% kill rate for pouron and subcutaneous injection, respectively.

摘要

将左旋咪唑浇泼剂对胎生网尾线虫的疗效与皮下注射左旋咪唑的疗效进行了比较。18头犊牛单独饲养,并人工感染胎生网尾线虫幼虫。27天和28天后收集粪便样本,测定每克粪便中的幼虫数量(l.p.g.)。然后将这些动物分成三个可比组。第1组动物不接受治疗作为对照。第2组动物接受10% w/v左旋咪唑皮下注射,剂量为5 mg/kg-1,第3组接受20% w/v左旋咪唑浇泼剂,以10 mg/kg-1的剂量经皮给药。治疗后7天和8天采集的粪便样本中l.p.g.测量结果表明,两个治疗组动物体内的蠕虫负担显著降低。治疗后14天的尸检显示,这些组中几乎没有成虫,表明浇泼剂和皮下注射的杀灭率分别为99%和98%。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of levamisole pour-on compared with levamisole subcutaneous injection against Dictyocaulus viviparus infection in calves.左旋咪唑浇泼剂与左旋咪唑皮下注射剂对犊牛胎生网尾线虫感染的疗效比较
Vet Parasitol. 1991 Jan;38(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(91)90011-j.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of dermal formulations of ivermectin and levamisole for the treatment and prevention of Dictyocaulus viviparus infection in cattle.
Vet Rec. 1990 Apr 14;126(15):357-9.
3
Efficacy of ivermectin and levamisole against immature Dictyocaulus viviparus in cattle.
Vet Rec. 1986 May 17;118(20):557-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.118.20.557.
4
Comparison of the persistent efficacy of the injectable and pour-on formulations of doramectin against artificially-induced infection with Dictyocaulus viviparus in cattle.多拉菌素注射剂和浇泼剂对牛人工感染胎生网尾线虫的持续药效比较。
Vet Parasitol. 1999 Nov;87(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(99)00163-6.
5
Activity of levamisole against developmental stages of D. viviparus in experimentally infected calves.左旋咪唑对实验感染小牛体内胎生网尾线虫发育阶段的作用。
Vet Rec. 1974 Jun 15;94(24):563-6. doi: 10.1136/vr.94.24.563.
6
Effect of treatment with levamisole or fenbendazole on primary experimental Dictyocaulus viviparus infection and on resistance in calves.左旋咪唑或芬苯达唑治疗对犊牛原发性实验性胎生网尾线虫感染及抵抗力的影响。
Vet Rec. 1980 Sep 20;107(12):271-5. doi: 10.1136/vr.107.12.271.
7
Effect of three sustained-release devices on parasitic bronchitis in first year calves.三种缓释装置对一岁犊牛寄生性支气管炎的影响。
Vet Rec. 1998 Jun 20;142(25):696-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.142.25.696.
8
The efficacy of moxidectin against Dictyocaulus viviparus in cattle.莫昔克丁对牛胎生网尾线虫的疗效。
Vet Q. 1992 Apr;14(2):79-80. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1992.9694335.
9
Persistence of the efficacy of pour-on and injectable moxidectin against Ostertagia ostertagi and Dictyocaulus viviparus in experimentally infected cattle.浇泼剂和注射用莫昔克丁对实验感染牛体内奥斯特他线虫和胎生网尾线虫的疗效持久性
Vet Rec. 1997 Jan 18;140(3):64-6. doi: 10.1136/vr.140.3.64.
10
Effect of repeated doses of levamisole on grazing cattle infected with Dictyocaulus viviparus.
Vet Rec. 1982 Oct 23;111(17):385-8. doi: 10.1136/vr.111.17.385.