Mandel Ellen M, Doyle William J, Winther Birgit, Alper Cuneyt M
Department of Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Apr;72(4):491-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
There is a continuing interest in defining the incidence, prevalence and burden of otitis media (OM) in the individual and population for purposes of assigning "risk factors". Often overlooked in past studies are the contributions of cold-like illnesses (CLIs) and sampling interval to those estimates.
Describe the incidence of symptomatic (AOM) and asymptomatic (OME) OM, the prevalence of OM, the contribution of CLI incidence, burden and other OM "risk factors" to the incidence and burden of OM, and the effect of sampling interval on those measures in children.
148 children (74 male; 131 white, aged 1.0-8.6 years) were followed from November 1 to April 30 by weekly pneumatic otoscopy to diagnose OM presence/absence and by daily parental diary to assign CLI episodes. Data for previously identified OM "risk factors" were collected on 127. Results were summarized using standard measures of incidence, prevalence and burden, and multiple regression techniques were used to identify OM "risk factors".
The basal OM prevalence was 20% with peaks in December and March and the temporal pattern was correlated with CLI prevalence. The incidence of OME (per 27,232 child-days) was 317, AOM was 74 and CLI was 456. The seasonal pattern of AOM and OME incidences tracked and was correlated with that for CLIs. New OM episodes were usually of short duration (<or=7 days in 40%, <or=4 weeks in 75-90%) and the usual OM burden was low (median=12%). OM and breastfeeding histories and CLI incidence/prevalence were significant predictors of OME and AOM incidence and OM burden. Longer sampling intervals were less efficient in capturing AOM and OME durations and incidences, but not OM burden.
These results demonstrate a high incidence and prevalence of OM, most OM episodes were of short duration and longer sampling intervals introduced biases into some parameter estimates. There was a significant relationship between OM and CLI incidence, prevalence and burden suggesting that CLI experience should be controlled for in assessing independent "risk factors" for AOM and OME.
为了确定“风险因素”,人们一直关注中耳炎(OM)在个体和人群中的发病率、患病率及负担情况。过去的研究常常忽视了类似感冒的疾病(CLIs)和采样间隔对这些估计值的影响。
描述有症状的急性中耳炎(AOM)和无症状的中耳积液(OME)的发病率、OM的患病率、CLIs发病率、负担及其他OM“风险因素”对OM发病率和负担的影响,以及采样间隔对儿童这些指标的影响。
从11月1日至4月30日,对148名儿童(74名男性;131名白人,年龄1.0 - 8.6岁)进行每周一次的鼓气耳镜检查以诊断是否存在OM,并通过家长每日记录来确定CLIs发作情况。收集了127名儿童先前确定的OM“风险因素”数据。结果采用发病率、患病率和负担的标准测量方法进行总结,并使用多元回归技术来确定OM“风险因素”。
基础OM患病率为20%,12月和3月出现峰值,其时间模式与CLIs患病率相关。OME的发病率(每27232儿童日)为317,AOM为74,CLIs为456。AOM和OME发病率的季节模式相互跟踪且与CLIs的模式相关。新的OM发作通常持续时间较短(40%≤7天,75 - 90%≤4周),且通常OM负担较低(中位数 = 12%)。OM和母乳喂养史以及CLIs发病率/患病率是OME和AOM发病率及OM负担的重要预测因素。较长的采样间隔在捕捉AOM和OME持续时间及发病率方面效率较低,但对OM负担没有影响。
这些结果表明OM的发病率和患病率较高,大多数OM发作持续时间较短,较长的采样间隔会给一些参数估计带来偏差。OM与CLIs的发病率、患病率和负担之间存在显著关系,这表明在评估AOM和OME的独立“风险因素”时应控制CLIs经历的影响。