Lupi S, Scapoli M, Cervato K, Pizzo F, Rizzello R, Carfora R, Gigli F, Pavanello S, Clonfero E, Gregorio P
Section of Hygiene and Occupational Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Italy.
J Prev Med Hyg. 2007 Sep;48(3):73-8.
The paper presents the early results of a study involving a group of 312 non smoking and not professionally exposed subjects (144 males and 168 females) in order to evaluate the probable presence of urinary mutagens possibly derived from aspecific exposures. Urine samples were assayed by the Ames test on the YG1024 Salmonella typhimurium strain in the presence of S9 mix with plate incorporation method with preincubation. At the moment of sample collection, the subjects were invited to fill a questionnaire on their main characteristics and lifestyle. On the basis of laboratory data analysis, it emerged that, on 288 samples with a valuable mutagenic activity, 20 urinary extracts (8 of which were males and 12 were females) showed mutagenicity levels twice as much as spontaneous revertants. Diet and indoor exposure to passive smoking, fireplace and cooking fume exposure seemed to play a major role among the lifestyle behaviours investigated in generating positive mutagenic response with a statistically significant difference between positive and negative samples induction (Chi square, P = 0.0057 and P = 0.0168 respectively). After correction of induced revertants by means of creatinine excretion determination, it appeared that females, who had the higher mean urinary mutagenic activity, showed a mutagenicity level twice as much as men (364 +/- 491 revertants/mmole creatinine for males against 605 +/- 868 revertants/mmole creatinine in females, Mann-Whitney U-test, z = -3.97, P < 0.0001) possibly in consequence of their greater cooking fumes exposure. The study, that carefully evaluated the characteristics of involved subjects, reveals the presence, even though modest, of mutagens in urine of an apparently not significantly exposed population. In addition, standardization of method leads to suppose little feasible a confounding influence of considered features. Moreover, it would be therefore rather interesting to study the effect of low exposure time persistence.
本文介绍了一项研究的早期结果,该研究涉及312名非吸烟且无职业暴露的受试者(144名男性和168名女性),旨在评估可能源自非特异性暴露的尿致突变物的可能存在情况。采用平板掺入法并进行预孵育,在存在S9混合物的情况下,用鼠伤寒沙门氏菌YG1024菌株的艾姆斯试验对尿样进行检测。在采集样本时,邀请受试者填写一份关于其主要特征和生活方式的问卷。根据实验室数据分析发现,在288份具有显著诱变活性的样本中,20份尿液提取物(其中8份为男性,12份为女性)的诱变水平是自发回复突变体的两倍。在调查的生活方式行为中,饮食、室内被动吸烟暴露、壁炉和烹饪油烟暴露似乎在产生阳性诱变反应中起主要作用,阳性和阴性样本诱导之间存在统计学显著差异(卡方检验,P值分别为0.0057和0.0168)。通过肌酐排泄测定校正诱导的回复突变体后,发现平均尿诱变活性较高的女性的诱变水平是男性的两倍(男性为364±491回复突变体/毫摩尔肌酐,女性为605±868回复突变体/毫摩尔肌酐,曼-惠特尼U检验,z = -3.97,P < 0.0001),这可能是由于她们接触烹饪油烟较多。该研究仔细评估了相关受试者的特征,揭示了在一个明显未受显著暴露的人群的尿液中存在诱变剂,尽管含量不高。此外,方法的标准化使得所考虑特征的混杂影响几乎不可行。而且,因此研究低暴露时间持续性的影响可能会相当有趣。