Lockhart Nicole C, Brooks Susan V
Dept. of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, The Univ. of Michigan, 2029 Biomedical Science Research Bldg., 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Apr;104(4):1109-15. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00850.2007. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
Skeletal muscles can be injured by their own contractions, especially when the muscle is stretched during a lengthening contraction. Exposing a muscle to a conditioning protocol of stretches without activation (passive stretches) before lengthening contractions reduces contraction-induced injury. Although passive stretching does not damage muscle fibers, neutrophils are elevated in the muscle after passive stretches. Our purpose was to investigate the relationship between neutrophil accumulation following passive stretches and the protection from subsequent contraction-induced injury provided by the passive stretches. Our hypothesis was that passive stretch conditioning would not provide protection from subsequent lengthening contraction-induced injury under circumstances when the increase in muscle neutrophils in response to the conditioning was prevented. Extensor digitorum longus muscles of mice were conditioned with passive stretches 14 days before exposure to a protocol of damaging lengthening contractions. Mice were either untreated or treated with an antibody (RB6-8C5) that reduced the level of circulating neutrophils by over 95% before administration of passive stretches. Neutrophil levels recovered in treated mice by the time lengthening contractions were performed. Lengthening contractions were also administered to muscles with no prior exposure to passive stretches. Maximum isometric force, number of damaged fibers, and muscle neutrophil concentration were measured 3 days after lengthening contractions. Compared with nonconditioned control muscles, the severity of contraction-induced injury was not reduced by prior passive stretch conditioning when mice were treated with RB6-8C5 before conditioning. We conclude that neutrophils contribute to adaptations that protect muscles from injury.
骨骼肌可因自身收缩而受损,尤其是在肌肉进行拉长收缩时被拉伸的情况下。在进行拉长收缩之前,让肌肉接受无激活的拉伸预处理方案(被动拉伸),可减少收缩诱导的损伤。尽管被动拉伸不会损伤肌纤维,但被动拉伸后肌肉中的中性粒细胞会增多。我们的目的是研究被动拉伸后中性粒细胞聚集与被动拉伸对随后收缩诱导损伤的保护作用之间的关系。我们的假设是,在防止因预处理而导致的肌肉中性粒细胞增加的情况下,被动拉伸预处理不会对随后的拉长收缩诱导损伤提供保护。在暴露于损伤性拉长收缩方案前14天,对小鼠的趾长伸肌进行被动拉伸预处理。在进行被动拉伸之前,小鼠要么不进行处理,要么用一种抗体(RB6-8C5)进行处理,该抗体可使循环中性粒细胞水平降低95%以上。在进行拉长收缩时,处理过的小鼠的中性粒细胞水平已恢复。也对未预先接受被动拉伸的肌肉进行拉长收缩。在拉长收缩3天后,测量最大等长力、受损纤维数量和肌肉中性粒细胞浓度。与未预处理的对照肌肉相比,当在预处理前用RB6-8C5处理小鼠时,预先的被动拉伸预处理并未降低收缩诱导损伤的严重程度。我们得出结论,中性粒细胞有助于使肌肉适应以保护其免受损伤。