Okawa Yayoi, Ueda Satoshi, Shuto Kenji, Mizoguchi Tatsuhiro
National Institute for Longevity Sciences, National Center of Geriatrics and Gerontology, ICF Commission, Statistics Committee of Social Security Council, Japan.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Mar;31(1):97-103. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282f4e7c5.
One of the purposes of this study is to describe the details and rationale of the criteria for qualifiers of the activity and participation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health that were developed based on population surveys and adopted provisionally by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Committee, Statistics Commission of Social Security Council of Japan in March 2007. The most important aspect of the criteria is the division of 'independence' of the activity into two different levels of 'Universal independence' (Qualifier 0) and 'Limited independence' (Qualifier 1) and the corresponding division of 'Full participation' (Qualifier 0) and 'Partial participation' (Qualifier 1) in the participation. These divisions reflect the paradigm shift in the basic concept of classification and evaluation of functioning and disability from 'only about people with disabilities' to 'about all people'. Another purpose is to present and analyze the accumulated data of population surveys on functioning in 17600 older people (aged 65 years and older) living in five different communities throughout Japan as the supporting evidence for the criteria. The analysis of these data offers good support for the relevance and usefulness of the criteria, especially in that the proposed division of Qualifier 0 ('Universal independence' and 'Full participation') and Qualifier 1 ('Limited independent and 'partial participation') is a very sensitive tool in the detection of milder problems in the activity and participation.
本研究的目的之一是描述《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》活动与参与限定值标准的详细内容及依据。该标准基于人口调查制定,并于2007年3月由日本社会保障理事会统计委员会国际功能、残疾和健康委员会临时采用。该标准最重要的方面是将活动的“独立性”分为“普遍独立”(限定值0)和“有限独立”(限定值1)两个不同级别,并对参与中的“充分参与”(限定值0)和“部分参与”(限定值1)进行相应划分。这些划分反映了功能与残疾分类及评估基本概念的范式转变,即从“仅针对残疾人”转变为“针对所有人”。另一个目的是呈现并分析对日本全国五个不同社区的17600名老年人(65岁及以上)进行的功能人口调查的累积数据,作为该标准的支撑证据。对这些数据的分析为该标准的相关性和实用性提供了有力支持,特别是所提议的限定值0(“普遍独立”和“充分参与”)与限定值1(“有限独立”和“部分参与”)的划分,在检测活动与参与中较轻微问题方面是一个非常灵敏的工具。