Perenboom Rom J M, Chorus Astrid M J
Division of Public Health, TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11-12):577-87. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000137081.
To report which existing survey instruments assess participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
A literature search for relevant survey instruments was conducted. Subsequently, survey instruments were evaluated of which the complete questionnaire, published in the English language, was obtained. Items on participation were evaluated according to the ICF, defined as involvement in life situations, including being autonomous to some extent or being able to control your own life.
Eleven survey instruments were identified, of which nine were evaluated on participation. All of the nine instruments measure participation to some extent. The two instruments closest to solely involve items on participation level are the Perceived Handicap Questionnaire (PHQ) and the London Handicap Scale (LHS). The PHQ is measuring the perception of participation. In the LHS, the items are formulated in terms of participation, while the response categories include all components of the ICF, from problems in body function to participation. Much more discussion is needed to be able to get an unambiguous picture to distinguish between activity and participation.
报告现有哪些调查工具根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类（ICF）对参与情况进行评估。
对相关调查工具进行文献检索。随后，对获取了完整英文问卷的调查工具进行评估。根据ICF对参与项目进行评估，ICF将参与定义为参与生活情境，包括在一定程度上自主或能够掌控自己的生活。
识别出11种调查工具，其中9种对参与情况进行了评估。这9种工具均在一定程度上测量了参与情况。最接近仅涉及参与水平项目的两种工具是感知障碍问卷（PHQ）和伦敦障碍量表（LHS）。PHQ测量的是对参与的感知。在LHS中，项目是按照参与来表述的，而应答类别包括ICF的所有组成部分，从身体功能问题到参与。为了能够清晰地区分活动和参与，还需要进行更多的讨论。
