• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估伙伴关系对改善临床质量的影响。

Evaluating the impact of partnerships to improve clinical quality.

作者信息

Donaldson Nancy, Horn Susan D, Edwards Janine C, Miller George, Gassaway Julie, Delbanco Suzanne F, Belden Greg, Hagan Michael

机构信息

Center for Research & Innovation in Patient Care, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):27-36. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33121-8.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33121-8
PMID:18277637
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Translating research into practice and policy is a complex process that links the research enterprise and health care delivery system of the United States. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Partnerships for Quality (PFQ) initiative expanded the scope of research translation beyond clinical practice, highlighting the role of strategic partners. A work group of AHRQ grantees developed a framework for systematic evaluation of the impact of strategic partnerships on research translation.

METHODS

The evaluation framework posits a hierarchy of impacts that cumulatively lead to observable patient outcomes. The evaluation framework captures (1) health care outcomes improvement, (2) clinical practice changes, (3) policies, procedures, and protocols, and (4) research and knowledge. After the framework and tool were subjected to face-validity critique among PFQ investigators, the concept of synergy was added. PFQ investigators pilot-tested the evaluation framework, and the PFQ tool was refined further.

RESULTS

Early feedback from PFQ grantees suggested that the framework is generalizable and potentially useful to guide investigators in capturing impacts of their work that might otherwise go unrecognized or trivialized.

DISCUSSION

The PFQ Evaluation Tool, a pragmatic approach for evaluating the impact of partnership-driven translation projects, provides a comprehensive evaluation of impacts, including synergistic outcomes.

摘要

背景

将研究成果转化为实践和政策是一个复杂的过程,它连接着美国的研究事业和医疗保健提供系统。医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的质量伙伴关系(PFQ)倡议将研究转化的范围扩展到临床实践之外,突出了战略合作伙伴的作用。一个由AHRQ受资助者组成的工作组制定了一个框架,用于系统评估战略伙伴关系对研究转化的影响。

方法

该评估框架提出了一个影响层次结构,这些影响会累积导致可观察到的患者结果。评估框架涵盖(1)医疗保健结果改善、(2)临床实践变化、(3)政策、程序和协议以及(4)研究和知识。在该框架和工具在PFQ研究人员中接受了表面效度批判之后,增加了协同作用的概念。PFQ研究人员对评估框架进行了预测试,并对PFQ工具进行了进一步完善。

结果

PFQ受资助者的早期反馈表明,该框架具有普遍性,可能有助于指导研究人员捕捉其工作中可能未被认识或被轻视的影响。

讨论

PFQ评估工具是一种评估伙伴关系驱动的转化项目影响的实用方法,它对影响进行了全面评估,包括协同成果。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of partnerships to improve clinical quality.评估伙伴关系对改善临床质量的影响。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):27-36. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33121-8.
2
Disseminating QI interventions.传播质量改进干预措施。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):48-65. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33123-1.
3
Sustainability of partnership projects: a conceptual framework and checklist.伙伴关系项目的可持续性:一个概念框架和清单
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):37-47. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33122-x.
4
Partnerships for quality: results of the AHRQ Council of Partners co-action across projects.追求质量的伙伴关系:医疗保健研究与质量局合作伙伴理事会跨项目共同行动的成果
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):4-6, 1. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33118-8.
5
Managing research partnerships: a commentary.管理研究伙伴关系:一篇评论
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):75-6, 1. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33125-5.
6
Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations.采用的结果:衡量个人和组织对证据的采纳情况。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1 Suppl 1:S41-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04048.x.
7
Best practice implementation: lessons learned from 20 partnerships.最佳实践实施:从20个合作伙伴关系中吸取的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):16-26. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33120-6.
8
Managing effective participatory research partnerships.管理有效的参与式研究伙伴关系。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):7-15. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33119-x.
9
Using Learning Communities to Support Adoption of Health Care Innovations.利用学习社区支持医疗保健创新的采用。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Oct;44(10):566-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
From research to daily clinical practice: what are the challenges in "translation"?从研究到日常临床实践:“转化”过程中的挑战有哪些?
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 May;30(5):235-45. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30026-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The TRANS-SAFE Patient Safety Learning Laboratory: A Protocol for Systems Improvement for Psychosocial Safety in Transgender Care.跨性别者安全患者安全学习实验室:跨性别护理中心理社会安全系统改进方案
J Patient Saf. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001383.