Upendra Bidre N, Meena Devkant, Chowdhury Buddhadev, Ahmad Abrar, Jayaswal Arvind
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4):384-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181646ba1.
Prospective cohort study.
We propose a simple outcome-based classification for assessment of pedicle screw positions based on postoperative computed tomography scan. This bridges the gap between high rates of pedicle screw misplacement and minimal complications reported.
The main deterrent for the use of thoracic pedicular screws is the feared neurovascular complications due to screw "misplacements." The literature shows that only a small fraction of the misplaced screws actually causes any complication, and some misplacements can be acceptable both in terms of safety and their biomechanical strength.
Sixty patients with various spinal disorders were included in the study. The mean age was 29.6 years (range, 12-72 years). The patients were divided into 2 groups for assessment of pedicle screw placements using postoperative computed tomography scans: scoliosis group with 24 patients and the nonscoliosis group with 34 patients. Placements of screws were assessed using the outcome-based classification and the Rongming Xu criteria of screw placement.
A total of 341 screws were assessed from 60 patients with various spinal disorders (scoliosis and nonscoliosis groups). Using the Rongming Xu criteria, the overall screw misplacement in scoliosis group was 50.72% (68 of 138) and that in nonscoliosis group was 45.45% (80 of 176 screws). Assessment of these screws using the outcome-based classification showed a high percentage of acceptable screw placements (type 1) - 89.85% (124 of 138 screws) in the scoliosis group and 86.93% (153 of 176 screws) in the nonscoliosis group.
The literature shows consensus over high rates of pedicle screw misplacement, but low clinical complications, in the hands of the best of spine surgeons. The concept of acceptable screw placements and the outcome classification makes the pedicle screw assessment results correlate better with the clinical outcome.
前瞻性队列研究。
我们基于术后计算机断层扫描提出一种简单的基于结果的分类方法,用于评估椎弓根螺钉位置。这弥合了椎弓根螺钉误置率高与所报道的并发症极少之间的差距。
使用胸椎椎弓根螺钉的主要阻碍是担心由于螺钉“误置”导致神经血管并发症。文献表明,只有一小部分误置的螺钉实际会引起任何并发症,并且某些误置在安全性及其生物力学强度方面都是可以接受的。
60例患有各种脊柱疾病的患者纳入本研究。平均年龄为29.6岁(范围12 - 72岁)。使用术后计算机断层扫描将患者分为2组以评估椎弓根螺钉置入情况:脊柱侧弯组24例患者,非脊柱侧弯组34例患者。使用基于结果的分类方法和徐荣明螺钉置入标准评估螺钉的置入情况。
对60例患有各种脊柱疾病(脊柱侧弯组和非脊柱侧弯组)的患者共评估了341枚螺钉。使用徐荣明标准,脊柱侧弯组的总体螺钉误置率为50.72%(138枚中的68枚),非脊柱侧弯组为45.45%(176枚螺钉中的80枚)。使用基于结果的分类方法评估这些螺钉显示,可接受的螺钉置入(1型)比例很高——脊柱侧弯组为89.85%(138枚螺钉中的124枚),非脊柱侧弯组为86.93%(176枚螺钉中的153枚)。
文献表明,在最优秀的脊柱外科医生手中,椎弓根螺钉误置率高,但临床并发症少,这一点已达成共识。可接受的螺钉置入概念和结果分类使椎弓根螺钉评估结果与临床结果的相关性更好。