Tandon Vikas
Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jun 4;41:102173. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102173. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Transpedicular screws have proven the test of time, yet they are not devoid of complications. Many newer techniques such as 2 D and 3D fluoroscopy,O arm Navigation assisted surgery, robotic assisted surgery have come into existence to the increase precision in pedicle screw insertion. But, complications do occur in their presence. We propose an Extra pedicular screw and hook system (EPSH) system with similar biomechanical property, better safety profile and short learning curve compared to traditional pedicle screw.
To Compare the pull out strength of Traditional Pedicle screw Vs Extra pedicular screw and hook system(EPSH).
Biomechanical testing was conducted according ASTM F543 guidelines to compare the pull-out strength of EPSH based construct and traditional pedicle screw construct. Six saw bone samples in each group considered. Screw of 5.5 mm diameter and length of 35 mm was used in both the groups. Pull out strength assessed by giving 5 mm/min axial load. The axial load Vs displacement of the screw were recorded and plotted. The maximum load required for screw failure is noted in both the group. Statistical analysis was done.
The mean peak load of pedicle screw group was found to be 1670.9 ± 393.2 N with mean displacement at peak load was found to be 13.44 ± 1.7 mm and in EPSH group it was 1416.4 ± 341.4 N and 15.78 ± 3.9 mm respectively. A paired -test showed no statistical difference(p < 0.05) between 2 groups.
EPSH has shown to have almost similar biomechanical property as that pedicle screw construct. With Addition of the hook, it provides an extra rotational stability as well. Being an extra-pedicular screw it has high safety profile and needs less expertise for insertion.
经椎弓根螺钉已经经受住了时间的考验,但它们并非没有并发症。许多更新的技术,如二维和三维荧光透视、O臂导航辅助手术、机器人辅助手术已经出现,以提高椎弓根螺钉置入的精度。但是,即使有这些技术,并发症仍然会发生。我们提出一种椎弓根外螺钉和钩系统(EPSH),与传统椎弓根螺钉相比,它具有相似的生物力学性能、更好的安全性和较短的学习曲线。
比较传统椎弓根螺钉与椎弓根外螺钉和钩系统(EPSH)的拔出强度。
根据ASTM F543指南进行生物力学测试,以比较基于EPSH的结构和传统椎弓根螺钉结构的拔出强度。每组考虑六个锯骨样本。两组均使用直径5.5毫米、长度35毫米的螺钉。通过施加5毫米/分钟的轴向载荷来评估拔出强度。记录并绘制轴向载荷与螺钉位移的关系图。记录两组中螺钉失效所需的最大载荷。进行统计分析。
椎弓根螺钉组的平均峰值载荷为1670.9±393.2牛,峰值载荷时的平均位移为13.44±1.7毫米,而EPSH组分别为1416.4±341.4牛和15.78±3.9毫米。配对检验显示两组之间无统计学差异(p<0.05)。
EPSH已显示出与椎弓根螺钉结构几乎相似的生物力学性能。通过增加钩子,它还提供了额外的旋转稳定性。作为一种椎弓根外螺钉,它具有很高的安全性,插入时所需的专业知识较少。