Suppr超能文献

碰撞速度对弱势道路使用者与汽车发动机罩碰撞中头部和脑部损伤结果的影响。

Influence of impact speed on head and brain injury outcome in vulnerable road user impacts to the car hood.

作者信息

Fredriksson Rikard, Zhang Liying, Boström Ola, Yang King

机构信息

Autoliv Research, 447 83 Vårgårda, Sweden.

出版信息

Stapp Car Crash J. 2007 Oct;51:155-67. doi: 10.4271/2007-22-0007.

Abstract

EuroNCAP and regulations in Europe and Japan evaluate the pedestrian protection performance of cars. The test methods are similar and they all have requirements for the passive protection of the hood area at a pedestrian to car impact speed of 40 km/h. In Europe, a proposal for a second phase of the regulation mandates a brake-assist system along with passive requirements. The system assists the driver in optimizing the braking performance during panic braking, resulting in activation only when the driver brakes sufficiently. In a European study this was estimated to occur in about 50% of pedestrian accidents. A future system for brake assistance will likely include automatic braking, in response to a pre-crash sensor, to avoid or mitigate injuries of vulnerable road users. An important question is whether these systems will provide sufficient protection, or if a parallel, passive pedestrian protection system will be necessary. This study investigated the influence of impact speed on head and brain injury risk, in impacts to the carhood. One car model was chosen and a rigid adjustable plate was mounted under the hood. Free-flying headform impacts were carried out at 20 and 30 km/h head impact velocities at different under-hood distances, 20 to 100 mm; and were compared to earlier tests at 40 km/h. The EEVC WG17 adult pedestrian headform was used for non-rotating tests and a Hybrid III adult 50th percentile head was used for rotational tests where linear and rotational acceleration was measured. Data from the rotational tests was used as input to a validated finite element model of the human head, the Wayne State University Head Injury Model (WSUHIM). The model was utilized to assess brain injury risk and potential injury mechanism in a pedestrian-hood impact. Although this study showed that it was not necessarily true that a lower HIC value reduced the risk for brain injury, it appeared, for the tested car model, under-hood distances of 60 mm in 20 km/h and 80 mm in 30 km/h reduced head injury values for both skull fractures and brain injuries. An earlier study showed that the corresponding value for a test speed of 40 km/h is 100 mm. A 10 km/h reduction in head impact velocity, as in automatic braking, allowed 20 mm less under-hood clearance with maintained head protection of the vulnerable road user.

摘要

欧洲新车评估程序(EuroNCAP)以及欧洲和日本的相关法规对汽车的行人保护性能进行评估。测试方法相似,并且它们都对以40公里/小时的行人与汽车碰撞速度下发动机罩区域的被动保护有要求。在欧洲,一项关于法规第二阶段的提案要求配备制动辅助系统以及被动要求。该系统在紧急制动期间协助驾驶员优化制动性能,仅在驾驶员充分制动时才会启动。在一项欧洲研究中,估计这在约50%的行人事故中会发生。未来的制动辅助系统可能会包括自动制动,以响应碰撞前传感器,避免或减轻弱势道路使用者的伤害。一个重要的问题是这些系统是否能提供足够的保护,或者是否需要一个并行的被动行人保护系统。本研究调查了碰撞速度对汽车发动机罩碰撞中头部和脑部受伤风险的影响。选择了一个汽车模型,并在发动机罩下方安装了一块刚性可调节板。在不同的发动机罩下方距离(20至100毫米)下,以20公里/小时和30公里/小时的头部碰撞速度进行自由飞行头部模型撞击试验;并与早期40公里/小时的试验进行比较。欧洲汽车安全委员会(EEVC)WG17成人行人头部模型用于非旋转试验,而Hybrid III成人第50百分位头部用于测量线性和旋转加速度的旋转试验。旋转试验的数据被用作输入到经过验证的人类头部有限元模型——韦恩州立大学头部损伤模型(WSUHIM)中。该模型被用于评估行人与发动机罩碰撞中的脑部受伤风险和潜在伤害机制。尽管本研究表明较低的头部损伤标准(HIC)值不一定能降低脑部受伤风险,但对于测试的汽车模型而言,在20公里/小时时发动机罩下方距离60毫米以及在30公里/小时时80毫米,似乎能降低颅骨骨折和脑部受伤的头部受伤值。一项早期研究表明,在40公里/小时的测试速度下对应的数值是100毫米。头部碰撞速度降低10公里/小时,如在自动制动中那样,在保持弱势道路使用者头部保护的情况下,允许发动机罩下方间隙减少20毫米。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验