Suppr超能文献

为何β-淀粉样蛋白(1-42)的C末端比β-淀粉样蛋白(1-40)的C末端更易展开?来自疏水相互作用的线索。

Why Is the C-terminus of Abeta(1-42) more unfolded than that of Abeta(1-40)? Clues from hydrophobic interaction.

作者信息

Shen Liang, Ji Hong-Fang, Zhang Hong-Yu

机构信息

Shandong Provincial Research Center for Bioinformatic Engineering and Technique, Center for Advanced Study, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Phys Chem B. 2008 Mar 13;112(10):3164-7. doi: 10.1021/jp7108237. Epub 2008 Feb 16.

Abstract

Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-42) are the main forms of amyloid beta (Abeta) peptides in the brain of Alzheimer's patients; however, the latter possesses much stronger aggregation and deposition propensity than the former, which is partially attributed to the more unfolded C-terminus of Abeta(1-42) than that of Abeta(1-40). To explore the physical basis underlying the different dynamic behaviors of both Abeta peptides, parallel molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-42) were performed to investigate their thermal unfolding processes. It is revealed that the addition of residues 41 and 42 in Abeta(1-42) disrupts the C-terminal hydrophobic core, which triggers the unraveling of the C-terminal helix of Abeta(1-42). This conclusion is supported by the MD simulation on the I41A mutant of Abeta(1-42), in which the C-terminal helix possesses relatively higher conformational stability than that of wild type Abeta(1-42) owing to the change in hydrophobic interaction patterns.

摘要

β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)(1-40)和Aβ(1-42)是阿尔茨海默病患者大脑中淀粉样β肽的主要形式;然而,后者比前者具有更强的聚集和沉积倾向,这部分归因于Aβ(1-42)的C末端比Aβ(1-40)的C末端更易展开。为了探究这两种Aβ肽不同动态行为背后的物理基础,对Aβ(1-40)和Aβ(1-42)进行了平行分子动力学(MD)模拟,以研究它们的热解折叠过程。结果表明,Aβ(1-42)中41和42位残基的添加破坏了C末端疏水核心,从而引发了Aβ(1-42)C末端螺旋的解旋。这一结论得到了Aβ(1-42)的I41A突变体的MD模拟的支持,由于疏水相互作用模式的改变,该突变体的C末端螺旋比野生型Aβ(1-42)具有相对更高的构象稳定性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验