Schabrun S M, Ridding M C, Miles T S
Research Centre for Human Movement Control, Discipline of Physiology, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Feb;27(3):750-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06039.x.
Human precision grip requires precise scaling of the grip force to match the weight and frictional conditions of the object. The ability to produce an accurately scaled grip force prior to lifting an object is thought to be the result of an internal feedforward model. However, relatively little is known about the roles of various brain regions in the control of such precision grip-lift synergies. Here we investigate the role of the primary motor (M1) and sensory (S1) cortices during a grip-lift task using inhibitory transcranial magnetic theta-burst stimulation (TBS). Fifteen healthy individuals received 40 s of either (i) M1 TBS, (ii) S1 TBS or (iii) sham stimulation. Following a 5-min rest, subjects lifted a manipulandum five times using a precision grip or completed a simple reaction time task. Following S1 stimulation, the duration of the pre-load phase was significantly longer than following sham stimulation. Following M1 stimulation, the temporal relationship between changes in grip and load force was altered, with changes in grip force coming to lag behind changes in load force. This result contrasts with that seen in the sham condition where changes in grip force preceded changes in load force. No significant difference was observed in the simple reaction task following either M1 or S1 stimulation. These results further quantify the contribution of the M1 to anticipatory grip-force scaling. In addition, they provide the first evidence for the contribution of S1 to object manipulation, suggesting that sensory information is not necessary for optimal functioning of anticipatory control.
人类的精确抓握需要精确调节握力,以匹配物体的重量和摩擦条件。在提起物体之前产生精确调节的握力的能力被认为是内部前馈模型的结果。然而,对于各个脑区在控制这种精确抓握-提起协同作用中的作用,人们了解得相对较少。在这里,我们使用抑制性经颅磁theta爆发刺激(TBS),研究了抓握-提起任务中初级运动皮层(M1)和感觉皮层(S1)的作用。15名健康个体接受了40秒的以下三种刺激之一:(i)M1 TBS,(ii)S1 TBS或(iii)假刺激。休息5分钟后,受试者使用精确抓握提起一个操作手柄5次,或完成一个简单的反应时间任务。在S1刺激后,预加载阶段的持续时间明显长于假刺激后。在M1刺激后,握力和负载力变化之间的时间关系发生了改变,握力变化滞后于负载力变化。这一结果与假刺激条件下的情况形成对比,在假刺激条件下握力变化先于负载力变化。在M1或S1刺激后的简单反应任务中未观察到显著差异。这些结果进一步量化了M1对预期握力缩放的贡献。此外,它们为S1对物体操作的贡献提供了首个证据,表明感觉信息对于预期控制的最佳功能并非必要。