Nakatani-Enomoto S, Bandoh M, Kita Y, Yamanouchi H, Enomoto H, Kimura T, Hashimoto K, Yahara O, Ugawa Y
Department of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2008 Aug;118(2):94-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00989.x. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
Conventional nerve conduction studies (NCS) are not sensitive to detect mild diabetic neuropathy. In order to detect subtle changes, we compared the conventional NCS with the relative refractory period (RRP) measurement of the median sensory nerve action potential by a paired stimulation method.
Subjects were 29 diabetic patients whose conventional NCS were all normal. They were divided into two groups: neurologically symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. Twenty-eight age-matched control subjects were also studied.
The RRP of the symptomatic diabetic patients (5.9 +/- 0.5 ms) and that of the asymptomatic patients (5.6 +/- 0.5 ms) was significantly longer than that of the control subjects (4.9 +/- 0.6 ms). There was no significant difference in RRP between the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. This may be due to the fact that NCS reflects mainly large myelinated fiber function and early symptoms represent mainly thin myelinated or unmyelinated fiber function.
The RRP measurement could reveal some mild involvement of peripheral nerves undetectable by conventional NCS, even though they caused no clinical symptoms.
传统神经传导研究(NCS)对于检测轻度糖尿病性神经病变并不敏感。为了检测细微变化,我们采用配对刺激法,将传统NCS与正中感觉神经动作电位的相对不应期(RRP)测量进行了比较。
研究对象为29例传统NCS均正常的糖尿病患者。他们被分为两组:有神经症状组和无症状组。还对28例年龄匹配的对照者进行了研究。
有症状糖尿病患者的RRP(5.9±0.5毫秒)和无症状患者的RRP(5.6±0.5毫秒)显著长于对照者(4.9±0.6毫秒)。有症状和无症状患者之间的RRP无显著差异。这可能是因为NCS主要反映大的有髓纤维功能,而早期症状主要代表细的有髓或无髓纤维功能。
RRP测量能够揭示传统NCS无法检测到的一些周围神经的轻度受累情况,即便这些受累未引起临床症状。