Cheng Allen, Cox Darren, Schmidt Brian L
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0440, USA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;66(3):523-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.040.
Resecting oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with an appropriate margin of uninvolved tissue is critical in preventing local recurrence and making the decision regarding postoperative radiation therapy. This task can be difficult due to the discrepancy between margins measured intraoperatively and those measured microscopically by the pathologist after specimen processing. The goal of this study is to quantify and compare the amount of margin discrepancy observed based on tumor location and staging.
Forty-one patients who underwent resective surgery with curative intent for primary oral SCC were included in this study. All patients underwent resection of the tumor with a measured 1 cm margin by one attending surgeon. Specimens were then submitted for processing and reviewing and histopathologic margins were measured. The closest histopathologic margin was compared with the in situ margin (1 cm) to determine percentage discrepancy. Percent discrepancies were grouped by locations (buccal mucosa, mandibular alveolar ridge, and retromolar trigone in group 1; maxillary alveolar ridge and palate in group 2; and oral tongue in group 3) and analyzed. Percent discrepancies grouped by stages T1/T2 or T3/T4 were compared.
The mean discrepancy for all patients was a statistically significant 59.02% (P < .0001). The mean discrepancy was 71.90% for group 1, 53.33% for group 2, and 42.14% for group 3 (P = .0133). The mean discrepancy in T1/T2 tumors was 51.48% and in T3/T4 tumors was 75.00% (P = .0264).
Oral SCC margin discrepancies after resection and specimen processing are highly significant. Tumors located in the buccal mucosa, retromolar trigone, and mandibular alveolar ridge show significantly greater discrepancies than tumors of the maxilla or oral tongue. Late stage tumors also show significantly greater margin discrepancies. These findings suggest that it might be prudent to consider oral site and staging when outlining margins to ensure adequacy of resection.
切除口腔鳞状细胞癌(SCC)时保留适当的未受累组织切缘对于预防局部复发以及决定术后放疗至关重要。由于术中测量的切缘与病理学家在标本处理后显微镜下测量的切缘存在差异,这项任务可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是根据肿瘤位置和分期对观察到的切缘差异量进行量化和比较。
本研究纳入了41例因原发性口腔SCC接受根治性手术切除的患者。所有患者均由一名主治外科医生切除肿瘤,术中测量切缘为1 cm。然后将标本送检进行处理和检查,并测量组织病理学切缘。将最接近的组织病理学切缘与原位切缘(1 cm)进行比较,以确定差异百分比。差异百分比按位置分组(第1组包括颊黏膜、下颌牙槽嵴和磨牙后三角;第2组包括上颌牙槽嵴和腭;第3组包括舌)并进行分析。比较按T1/T2或T3/T4分期分组的差异百分比。
所有患者的平均差异为具有统计学意义的59.02%(P <.0001)。第1组的平均差异为71.90%,第2组为53.33%,第3组为42.14%(P = 0.0133)。T1/T2期肿瘤的平均差异为51.48%,T3/T4期肿瘤为75.00%(P = 0.0264)。
切除和标本处理后口腔SCC的切缘差异非常显著。位于颊黏膜、磨牙后三角和下颌牙槽嵴的肿瘤比上颌或舌部肿瘤的差异明显更大。晚期肿瘤的切缘差异也明显更大。这些发现表明,在确定切缘时考虑口腔部位和分期以确保切除的充分性可能是谨慎的做法。