• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当个体素质不同时,觅食配对中领导者和跟随者的出现情况。

The emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs when the qualities of individuals differ.

作者信息

Rands Sean A, Cowlishaw Guy, Pettifor Richard A, Rowcliffe J Marcus, Johnstone Rufus A

机构信息

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.

出版信息

BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Feb 18;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-51.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2148-8-51
PMID:18282297
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2276478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Foraging in groups offers animals a number of advantages, such as increasing their likelihood of finding food or detecting and avoiding predators. In order for a group to remain together, there has to be some degree of coordination of behaviour and movement between its members (which may in some cases be initiated by a decision-making leader, and in other cases may emerge as an underlying property of the group). For example, behavioural synchronisation is a phenomenon where animals within a group initiate and then continue to conduct identical behaviours, and has been characterised for a wide range of species. We examine how a pair of animals should behave using a state-dependent approach, and ask what conditions are likely to lead to behavioural synchronisation occurring, and whether one of the individuals is more likely to act as a leader.

RESULTS

The model we describe considers how the energetic gain, metabolic requirements and predation risks faced by the individuals affect measures of their energetic state and behaviour (such as the degree of behavioural synchronisation seen within the pair, and the value to an individual of knowing the energetic state of its colleague). We explore how predictable changes in these measures are in response to changes in physiological requirements and predation risk. We also consider how these measures should change when the members of the pair are not identical in their metabolic requirements or their susceptibility to predation. We find that many of the changes seen in these measures are complex, especially when asymmetries exist between the members of the pair.

CONCLUSION

Analyses are presented that demonstrate that, although these general patterns are robust, care needs to be taken when considering the effects of individual differences, as the relationship between individual differences and the resulting qualitative changes in behaviour may be complex. We discuss how these results are related to experimental observations, and how the model and its predictions could be extended.

摘要

背景

群体觅食为动物带来诸多优势,比如增加找到食物的可能性,或发现并躲避捕食者。为使群体保持在一起,其成员之间必须存在一定程度的行为和行动协调(在某些情况下可能由决策领导者发起,而在其他情况下可能作为群体的一种潜在特性出现)。例如,行为同步是一种群体内动物开始并持续进行相同行为的现象,已在众多物种中得到描述。我们使用一种状态依赖方法来研究一对动物应如何表现,并探讨哪些条件可能导致行为同步的发生,以及其中一个个体是否更有可能充当领导者。

结果

我们所描述的模型考虑了个体面临的能量获取、代谢需求和捕食风险如何影响它们的能量状态和行为指标(例如在这对动物中观察到的行为同步程度,以及个体了解其同伴能量状态的价值)。我们探究这些指标的可预测变化如何响应生理需求和捕食风险的变化。我们还考虑当这对动物的成员在代谢需求或对捕食的易感性方面不相同时,这些指标应如何变化。我们发现这些指标中观察到的许多变化都很复杂,尤其是当这对动物的成员之间存在不对称性时。

结论

所呈现的分析表明,尽管这些一般模式是稳健的,但在考虑个体差异的影响时需要谨慎,因为个体差异与行为产生的定性变化之间的关系可能很复杂。我们讨论这些结果如何与实验观察相关,以及该模型及其预测如何能够得到扩展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c613/2276478/77cf5236667d/1471-2148-8-51-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c613/2276478/50eeabf2b93a/1471-2148-8-51-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c613/2276478/77cf5236667d/1471-2148-8-51-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c613/2276478/50eeabf2b93a/1471-2148-8-51-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c613/2276478/77cf5236667d/1471-2148-8-51-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs when the qualities of individuals differ.当个体素质不同时,觅食配对中领导者和跟随者的出现情况。
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Feb 18;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-51.
2
Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs.觅食配对中领导者和跟随者的自发出现。
Nature. 2003 May 22;423(6938):432-4. doi: 10.1038/nature01630.
3
The effects of dominance on leadership and energetic gain: a dynamic game between pairs of social foragers.优势对领导能力和能量获取的影响:社会觅食者对之间的动态博弈。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002252. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds.个体层面的个性影响野生鸟类的社会觅食和集体行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 22;281(1789):20141016. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1016.
6
Leading ladies: leadership of group movements in a pair-living, co-dominant, monomorphic primate across reproductive stages and fruit availability seasons.领衔主演:在一个具有对偶生活习性、共同主导、单态的灵长类动物中,跨越繁殖阶段和果实可获得季节,领导群体运动。
Am J Primatol. 2012 Jul;74(7):591-601. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22011.
7
Torpor reduces predation risk by compensating for the energetic cost of antipredator foraging behaviours.蛰伏通过补偿反捕食觅食行为的能量成本来降低被捕食风险。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Dec 19;285(1893):20182370. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2370.
8
The social structure and strategies of delphinids: predictions based on an ecological framework.海豚的社会结构与策略:基于生态框架的预测
Adv Mar Biol. 2007;53:195-294. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(07)53003-8.
9
Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups.与群体中空间位置相关的差异化适应度回报。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 May;69(2):187-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1994.tb01505.x.
10
Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk.个体间觅食差异调节了感知捕食风险下的资源开发。
Oecologia. 2020 Dec;194(4):621-634. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality variation is eroded by simple social behaviours in collective foragers.简单的社会行为会使群体觅食者的个性差异逐渐消失。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Mar 2;19(3):e1010908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010908. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Behavioural synchrony between fallow deer Dama dama is related to spatial proximity.赤鹿(Dama dama)的行为同步与空间接近度有关。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 May 6;21(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01814-9.
3
Behavioral Causes, Ecological Consequences, and Management Challenges Associated with Wildlife Foraging in Human-Modified Landscapes.

本文引用的文献

1
Habitat Selection Under Predation Hazard: Test of a Model with Foraging Minnows.捕食风险下的栖息地选择:用食蚊鱼对一个模型的测试
Ecology. 1987 Dec;68(6):1856-1862. doi: 10.2307/1939877.
2
The relationship between foraging and shoal position in a mixed shoal of roach (Rutilus rutilus) and chub (Leuciscus cephalus): a field study.拟鲤(Rutilus rutilus)和赤睛鱼(Leuciscus cephalus)混合鱼群中觅食与鱼群位置的关系:一项实地研究。
Oecologia. 1993 Mar;93(3):356-359. doi: 10.1007/BF00317878.
3
Sexual segregation in vertebrates: proximate and ultimate causes.
与人类改造景观中野生动物觅食相关的行为原因、生态后果及管理挑战
Bioscience. 2020 Nov 11;71(1):40-54. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaa129. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies.群居马匹和矮种马的觅食效率、社会地位与身体状况
PeerJ. 2020 Nov 9;8:e10305. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10305. eCollection 2020.
5
Social Learning in Horses-Fact or Fiction?马的社会学习——事实还是虚构?
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Sep 6;5:212. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00212. eCollection 2018.
6
Dominant men are faster in decision-making situations and exhibit a distinct neural signal for promptness.主导型男性在决策情境中反应更快,并表现出明显的快速决策神经信号。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Oct 1;28(10):3740-3751. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy195.
7
Black-headed gulls synchronise their activity with their nearest neighbours.黑头鸥与邻近个体同步活动。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28378-x.
8
Selection for Collective Aggressiveness Favors Social Susceptibility in Social Spiders.选择有利于社会蜘蛛的集体攻击性,有利于社会易感性。
Curr Biol. 2018 Jan 8;28(1):100-105.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.038. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Flexible clock systems: adjusting the temporal programme.灵活的时钟系统:调整时间方案。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 19;372(1734). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0254.
10
Emergence of leadership in a robotic fish group under diverging individual personality traits.在个体性格特征各异的机器鱼群体中领导力的出现。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 May 24;4(5):161015. doi: 10.1098/rsos.161015. eCollection 2017 May.
脊椎动物的性隔离:近因和远因。
Integr Comp Biol. 2007 Aug;47(2):245-57. doi: 10.1093/icb/icm030. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
4
Chaos in ecological systems: The coals that Newcastle forgot.生态系统中的混沌:纽卡斯尔遗忘的煤炭。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1986 Sep;1(3):58-63. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(86)90018-2.
5
Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game.安全、自私的哨兵之间的互利共生:一场动态博弈。
Am Nat. 1997 Sep;150(3):373-92. doi: 10.1086/286070.
6
The Interaction of Selection and Linkage. I. General Considerations; Heterotic Models.选择与连锁的相互作用。I. 一般考量;杂种优势模型。
Genetics. 1964 Jan;49(1):49-67. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.1.49.
7
Statistical measures for defining an individual's degree of independence within state-dependent dynamic games.用于定义个体在状态依赖动态博弈中独立程度的统计度量。
BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Oct 12;6:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-81.
8
The role of foraging behaviour in the sexual segregation of the African elephant.觅食行为在非洲象性别隔离中的作用。
Oecologia. 2006 Nov;150(2):344-54. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0521-1. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
9
Sexual segregation in fallow deer: are mixed-sex groups especially unstable because of asynchrony between the sexes?黇鹿的性别隔离:由于两性之间的不同步,混合性别群体是否特别不稳定?
C R Biol. 2006 Jul;329(7):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2006.03.023. Epub 2006 May 2.
10
State-dependent foraging rules for social animals in selfish herds.自私兽群中群居动物的状态依赖觅食规则。
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2613-20. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2906.