Tatler Benjamin W, Melcher David
School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK.
Perception. 2007;36(12):1715-29. doi: 10.1068/p5592.
A fundamental question in perception is how we visually encode and retain information about a complex scene in order to allow effective operation within it. Interestingly, the stimuli used to investigate scene perception have varied greatly between studies, ranging from line drawings to coloured drawings, computer-generated scenes, photographs, and real scenes. Are findings from these different types of scene stimulus equally ecologically valid? Two experiments are reported that address this issue. In the first we compared photographic and non-photographic scenes and found that observers perform better in questions testing object memory when viewing photographs, suggesting an initial benefit for encoding information from photographs. In the second we found that whether or not non-photographic scenes obeyed realistic scene-organising properties influenced object-memory formation. Effects varied for the different question types, but again were most prominent early in viewing. We conclude that in the search for an understanding of everyday scene perception we must be very careful in our choice of scene stimuli and in our interpretation of findings from the laboratory.
知觉中的一个基本问题是,我们如何在视觉上编码并保留有关复杂场景的信息,以便在其中有效地运作。有趣的是,用于研究场景知觉的刺激在不同研究中差异很大,从线条图到彩色图、计算机生成的场景、照片以及真实场景。来自这些不同类型场景刺激的研究结果在生态效度上是否同样有效?本文报告了两项针对此问题的实验。在第一个实验中,我们比较了照片场景和非照片场景,发现观察者在查看照片时,在测试物体记忆的问题上表现更好,这表明从照片中编码信息具有初步优势。在第二个实验中,我们发现非照片场景是否遵循现实场景组织特性会影响物体记忆的形成。不同问题类型的影响各不相同,但同样在观看初期最为显著。我们得出结论,在寻求对日常场景知觉的理解时,我们必须非常谨慎地选择场景刺激以及解释实验室研究结果。