• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生殖健康研究中调查数据映射的保密性问题。

Confidentiality concerns with mapping survey data in reproductive health research.

作者信息

Sherman Jill E, Fetters Tamara L

机构信息

Department of Geography, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#3220, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3220, USA.

出版信息

Stud Fam Plann. 2007 Dec;38(4):309-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00143.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00143.x
PMID:18284045
Abstract

The increasing availability of georeferenced datasets creates new opportunities to perform spatial analysis of social science and public health survey data, but also raises ethical issues regarding the potential for unintended violation of the confidentiality of respondents. This article examines these ethical challenges by reflecting on the experience of a study mapping the facilities that provide abortion-related services in Cambodia. The technique of masking is examined as a potential method for preventing reidentification of respondents in georeferenced surveys. Broader solutions are offered for ways to balance the potentially conflicting goals of spatial analysis and protection of confidentiality.

摘要

地理参考数据集的日益普及为社会科学和公共卫生调查数据的空间分析创造了新机会,但也引发了有关意外侵犯受访者保密性可能性的伦理问题。本文通过反思柬埔寨一项绘制提供堕胎相关服务设施地图的研究经验,审视了这些伦理挑战。掩码技术作为一种在地理参考调查中防止重新识别受访者的潜在方法进行了研究。针对如何平衡空间分析和保密性保护这两个潜在冲突目标,提供了更广泛的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Confidentiality concerns with mapping survey data in reproductive health research.生殖健康研究中调查数据映射的保密性问题。
Stud Fam Plann. 2007 Dec;38(4):309-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00143.x.
2
Confidentiality and spatially explicit data: concerns and challenges.保密性与空间明确数据:问题与挑战
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15337-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507804102. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
3
Reverse geocoding: concerns about patient confidentiality in the display of geospatial health data.反向地理编码:对地理空间健康数据显示中患者隐私问题的担忧。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:905.
4
No place to hide--reverse identification of patients from published maps.无处可藏——从已发表的地图中反向识别患者
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1741-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc061891.
5
Ethical considerations and potential threats to validity for three methods commonly used to collect geographic information in studies among people who use drugs.在针对吸毒人群的研究中,常用的三种收集地理信息方法的伦理考量及对有效性的潜在威胁。
Addict Behav. 2016 Oct;61:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 May 17.
6
Confidentiality in health care: conflicting legal and ethical issues.医疗保健中的保密性:相互冲突的法律和伦理问题。
Nurs Stand. 2007;21(21):42-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2007.01.21.21.42.c4513.
7
Privacy, confidentiality and abortion statistics: a question of public interest?隐私、保密和堕胎统计数据:公众利益问题?
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):31-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.041186. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
8
Ethics and health systems research in 'post'-conflict situations.冲突“后”局势下的伦理与卫生系统研究
Dev World Bioeth. 2004 Dec;4(2):139-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8731.2004.00089.x.
9
Ethics and patient privacy.伦理与患者隐私。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2008 Nov-Dec;48(6):e144-52; quiz e153-4. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07144.
10
Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study.关于使用社会空间数据以研究健康的社会决定因素的保密考量:性与生殖健康案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;166:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Realities of using self-administered smartphone surveys to solve sustainability challenges.使用自我管理的智能手机调查来解决可持续发展挑战的现实情况。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):1134. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05305-w. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
2
The utility of Zip4 codes in spatial epidemiological analysis.Zip4 码在空间流行病学分析中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 May 31;18(5):e0285552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285552. eCollection 2023.
3
Daily activity locations k-anonymity for the evaluation of disclosure risk of individual GPS datasets.
日常活动地点 k-匿名化评估个体 GPS 数据集的披露风险。
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Mar 5;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00201-9.
4
Addressing the data guardian and geospatial scientist collaborator dilemma: how to share health records for spatial analysis while maintaining patient confidentiality.解决数据保护者和地理空间科学家协作困境:如何在保护患者隐私的同时共享健康记录进行空间分析。
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 Dec 21;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0194-8.
5
Community Engaged Cumulative Risk Assessment of Exposure to Inorganic Well Water Contaminants, Crow Reservation, Montana.社区参与的无机井水污染物暴露累积风险评估,蒙大拿州克劳族保留地。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):76. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010076.
6
Sharing Public Health Research Data: Toward the Development of Ethical Data-Sharing Practice in Low- and Middle-Income Settings.共享公共卫生研究数据:推动低收入和中等收入地区道德数据共享实践的发展。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Jul;10(3):217-24. doi: 10.1177/1556264615593494.
7
HIV Programs for Sex Workers: Lessons and Challenges for Developing and Delivering Programs.面向性工作者的艾滋病防治项目:项目开发与实施中的经验教训及挑战
PLoS Med. 2015 Jun 16;12(6):e1001808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001808. eCollection 2015 Jun.
8
Geomasking sensitive health data and privacy protection: an evaluation using an E911 database.地理掩码保护敏感健康数据与隐私:基于E911数据库的评估
Geocarto Int. 2010 Oct 1;25(6):443-452. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2010.496496.
9
Musings on privacy issues in health research involving disaggregate geographic data about individuals.关于涉及个体离散地理位置数据的健康研究中隐私问题的思考。
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Jul 20;8:46. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-46.