Iida Masumi, Seidman Gwendolyn, Shrout Patrick E, Fujita Kentaro, Bolger Niall
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;94(3):460-78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.460.
Whereas supportive interactions are usually studied from the perspective of recipients alone, the authors used a dyadic design to incorporate the perspectives of both provider and recipient. In 2 daily diary studies, the authors modeled provider reports of support provision in intimate dyads over several weeks. The 1st involved couples experiencing daily stressors (n = 79); the 2nd involved couples experiencing a major professional stressor (n = 196). The authors hypothesized that factors relating to (a) recipients (their requests for support, moods, and stressful events), (b) providers (their moods and stressful events), (c) the relationship (relationship emotions and history of support exchanges), and (d) the stressor (daily vs. major stressors) would each predict daily support provision. Across both studies, characteristics of providers, recipients, and their relationship emerged as key predictors. Implications for theoretical models of dyadic support processes are discussed.
鉴于支持性互动通常仅从接受者的角度进行研究，作者采用了二元设计来纳入提供者和接受者双方的观点。在两项日常日记研究中，作者对亲密二元组中提供者在数周内提供支持的报告进行了建模。第一项研究涉及经历日常压力源的夫妻（n = 79）；第二项研究涉及经历重大职业压力源的夫妻（n = 196）。作者假设与以下方面相关的因素：（a）接受者（他们对支持的请求、情绪和压力事件），（b）提供者（他们的情绪和压力事件），（c）关系（关系情绪和支持交换历史），以及（d）压力源（日常压力源与重大压力源），都将预测每日支持的提供情况。在两项研究中，提供者、接受者及其关系的特征均成为关键预测因素。本文讨论了对二元支持过程理论模型的启示。
