Lockhart Mark E, Wells Charles G, Morgan Desiree E, Fineberg Naomi S, Robbin Michelle L
Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St. S, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Mar;190(3):650-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2666.
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the causes, waveform morphology, and clinical outcomes of high-resistance reversed diastolic flow in transplanted kidneys.
To identify patients with reversed diastolic flow, we performed a review of 5,089 renal transplant Doppler sonograms obtained over a 10-year period. Waveform morphology was correlated with surgical-histologic findings and clinical outcomes.
Fifty-nine patients (33 male, 26 female; age range, 14-69 years) with reversed diastolic flow fell into three chronologic groups: acute group (six patients), transplant < 24 hours; perioperative group (34 patients), transplant < or = 30 days; and long-term group (19 patients), transplant > 30 days. Acute reversed diastolic flow was associated with higher likelihood of graft survival (p = 0.001, Fisher's exact test) compared with reversed diastolic flow discovered in the perioperative or long-term group. In the acute group, hematoma, acute tubular necrosis, renal vein thrombosis, and vascular kink produced reversed diastolic flow. The causes of reversed diastolic flow for the perioperative group were acute tubular necrosis, rejection, and renal vein thrombosis; for the long-term group, reasons for diastolic reversal were rejection, glomerulosclerosis, low cardiac output, and diabetic nephrosclerosis. The causes of reversed diastolic flow were not differentiated by waveform morphology.
The causes of reversed diastolic flow cannot be distinguished by waveform morphology. Patients with reversed diastolic flow < 24 hours after transplantation warrant emergent exploration because correction of treatable causes may lead to recovered function. Long-standing renal transplants with reversed diastolic flow are not likely salvageable.
本研究旨在评估移植肾高阻力舒张期反向血流的原因、波形形态及临床结局。
为识别舒张期反向血流的患者,我们回顾了10年间获取的5089份肾移植多普勒超声图像。波形形态与手术组织学结果及临床结局相关。
59例(33例男性,26例女性;年龄范围14 - 69岁)有舒张期反向血流的患者分为三个时间组:急性组(6例患者),移植后<24小时;围手术期组(34例患者),移植后<或=30天;长期组(19例患者),移植后>30天。与围手术期或长期组发现的舒张期反向血流相比,急性舒张期反向血流与移植肾存活的可能性更高相关(p = 0.001,Fisher精确检验)。在急性组,血肿、急性肾小管坏死、肾静脉血栓形成和血管扭结导致舒张期反向血流。围手术期组舒张期反向血流的原因是急性肾小管坏死、排斥反应和肾静脉血栓形成;长期组舒张期反向血流的原因是排斥反应、肾小球硬化、心输出量低和糖尿病肾病。舒张期反向血流的原因不能通过波形形态来区分。
舒张期反向血流的原因无法通过波形形态来区分。移植后<24小时出现舒张期反向血流的患者需要紧急探查,因为纠正可治疗的原因可能导致功能恢复。长期存在舒张期反向血流的肾移植不太可能挽救。