Vehreschild Jörg J, Böhme Angelika, Reichert Dietmar, Kiehl Michael G, Arenz Dorothee, Pankraz Karen, Kochanek Matthias, Ullmann Andrew J, Cornely Oliver A
Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Studienzentrum Infektiologie II, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Medizinische Klinik II, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Int J Hematol. 2008 Mar;87(2):126-131. doi: 10.1007/s12185-008-0045-z. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
Invasive fungal infections are frequent and often deadly complications in patients with malignant hematological diseases. Voriconazole is a third generation triazole antifungal with broad activity against most clinically relevant fungal pathogens. Clinical practice often deviates from insights gained from controlled randomized trials. We conducted a multi-centre survey to evaluate efficacy, safety, treatment indications and dosing of voriconazole outside clinical trials. Patients receiving voriconazole were documented via electronic data capturing. An analysis was conducted after submission of 100 episodes from September 2004 to November 2005. Voriconazole was administered for suspected or proven invasive fungal infection (IFI) (57%), as empirical treatment in patients with fever of unknown origin (21%) and secondary (19%) as well as primary (3%) prophylaxis of IFI. Investigators' assessment of fungal infection often diverted from EORTC/MSG 2002 criteria. A favorable response was reported in 61.4% for suspected or proven IFI and 52.4% for empirical treatment. Mortality was 15%, 26.7% of which was attributable to IFI. Breakthrough fungal infections occurred in four (21.1%) patients with voriconazole as secondary prophylaxis. Toxicity and adverse events comprised elevated liver enzymes and visual disturbances. Although indications frequently deviated from clinical evidence and legal approval, voriconazole showed efficacy and safety, comparable to major controlled clinical trials. Data from this survey demonstrate the difficulty of putting drugs to their approved use in IFI.
侵袭性真菌感染是恶性血液病患者常见且往往致命的并发症。伏立康唑是一种第三代三唑类抗真菌药物,对大多数临床相关真菌病原体具有广泛活性。临床实践常常偏离对照随机试验所获得的见解。我们开展了一项多中心调查,以评估伏立康唑在临床试验之外的疗效、安全性、治疗指征和剂量。通过电子数据采集记录接受伏立康唑治疗的患者。在提交了2004年9月至2005年11月期间的100例病例后进行了分析。伏立康唑用于疑似或确诊的侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)(57%),作为不明原因发热患者的经验性治疗(21%),以及作为IFI的二级(19%)和一级(3%)预防。研究者对真菌感染的评估常常偏离欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/美国国立医学研究院(EORTC/MSG)2002标准。对于疑似或确诊的IFI,报告的良好反应率为61.4%,经验性治疗为52.4%。死亡率为15%,其中26.7%归因于IFI。在4例(21.1%)接受伏立康唑二级预防的患者中发生了突破性真菌感染。毒性和不良事件包括肝酶升高和视觉障碍。尽管治疗指征常常偏离临床证据和法定批准,但伏立康唑显示出与主要对照临床试验相当的疗效和安全性。本次调查的数据表明在IFI中使药物按批准用途使用存在困难。