Suppr超能文献

口服伏立康唑用于非复杂性发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的经验性抗真菌治疗。

Oral voriconazole for empiric antifungal treatment in patients with uncomplicated febrile neutropenia.

作者信息

Przepiorka Donna, Buadi Francis K, McClune Brian

机构信息

University of Tennessee Blood and Marrow Transplant Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38104, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Jan;28(1):58-63. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.1.58.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the success rate and toxicity profile of oral voriconazole when used as empiric antifungal therapy in patients with uncomplicated persistent neutropenic fever.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-seven patients who received oral voriconazole as empiric antifungal treatment during 31 episodes of persistent neutropenic fever between August 1, 2003, and April 1, 2006.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were collected on patient demographics, diagnosis, cancer treatment plan, voriconazole regimen, dates of voriconazole treatment, other antibiotics administered during the episode of fever, and adverse events. Patient survival data from at least 3 months of follow-up were also collected. Treatment success, which was defined as survival to the resolution of fever without a need to change antibiotics and without new fungal infections, was also determined. Median duration of therapy was 11 days (range 2-54 days). No patient discontinued the drug because of toxicity. The success rate was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-73%). For all patients, 90-day survival from the start of voriconazole treatment was 81% (95% CI 63-93%). Neither treatment success nor 90-day survival rates differed significantly when they were compared by the route used for loading doses or by the presence of a possible invasive fungal infection at the start of voriconazole therapy.

CONCLUSION

Oral voriconazole appears to be a safe empiric antifungal treatment with an encouraging rate of activity for patients with neutropenia and uncomplicated persistent fever. Further research, including randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of intravenous versus oral voriconazole, is needed.

摘要

研究目的

确定口服伏立康唑在无并发症的持续性中性粒细胞减少性发热患者中作为经验性抗真菌治疗的成功率和毒性特征。

设计

回顾性病历审查。

地点

大学医院。

患者

2003年8月1日至2006年4月1日期间,27例在31次持续性中性粒细胞减少性发热发作时接受口服伏立康唑作为经验性抗真菌治疗的患者。

测量指标及主要结果

收集了患者的人口统计学资料、诊断、癌症治疗方案、伏立康唑治疗方案、伏立康唑治疗日期、发热期间使用的其他抗生素以及不良事件。还收集了至少3个月随访期的患者生存数据。治疗成功定义为存活至发热消退,无需更换抗生素且无新的真菌感染,并据此进行判定。中位治疗持续时间为11天(范围2 - 54天)。没有患者因毒性而停药。成功率为55%(95%置信区间[CI] 36 - 73%)。对于所有患者,从伏立康唑治疗开始起90天生存率为81%(95% CI 63 - 93%)。按负荷剂量给药途径或伏立康唑治疗开始时是否存在可能的侵袭性真菌感染进行比较时,治疗成功率和90天生存率均无显著差异。

结论

口服伏立康唑似乎是一种安全的经验性抗真菌治疗药物,对中性粒细胞减少且无并发症的持续性发热患者具有令人鼓舞的活性。需要进一步开展研究,包括比较静脉注射与口服伏立康唑疗效的随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验