• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

梅奥诊所对用于预测根治性前列腺切除术后生存率的达米科风险组分类法的验证。

Mayo Clinic validation of the D'amico risk group classification for predicting survival following radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Boorjian Stephen A, Karnes R Jeffrey, Rangel Laureano J, Bergstralh Eric J, Blute Michael L

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1354-60; discussion 1360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.061. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.061
PMID:18289596
Abstract

PURPOSE

The D'Amico risk group classification was originally developed to estimate the risk of biochemical recurrence following treatment for localized prostate cancer. We externally validated the ability of the risk groups to predict clinical progression, and cancer specific and overall survival following radical prostatectomy, and identify predictors of outcome in patients with high risk disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the records of 7,591 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between 1987 and 2003. Postoperative survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the ability of the risk groups to predict survival and to evaluate the impact of clinicopathological factors on outcome in patients at high risk.

RESULTS

Preoperative risk group stratification predicted the patient risk of biochemical and local recurrence, systemic progression, and cancer specific and overall survival (each p <0.001). The HR of death from prostate cancer after surgery in patients with high or intermediate risk disease was 11.5 (95% CI 5.9 to 22.3, p <0.0001) and 6.3 (95% CI 3.3 to 12.3, p <0.0001), respectively, compared to patients at low risk. In patients in the high risk group biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.006), pathological Gleason score (p = 0.006), pathological tumor stage (p = 0.04), positive lymph nodes (p = 0.02) and positive surgical margins (p = 0.008) predicted death from prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

We validated the ability of the risk group stratification to predict disease progression and patient survival following radical prostatectomy. Additional prognostic information from surgical staging may assist in individualized postoperative management, particularly for patients at high risk.

摘要

目的

达米科风险组分类最初是为了评估局限性前列腺癌治疗后生化复发的风险。我们对外验证了风险组预测根治性前列腺切除术后临床进展、癌症特异性生存率和总生存率的能力,并确定高危疾病患者的预后预测因素。

材料与方法

我们评估了1987年至2003年间在本机构接受根治性前列腺切除术的7591例连续患者的记录。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计术后生存率。使用Cox比例风险回归模型分析风险组预测生存率的能力,并评估临床病理因素对高危患者预后的影响。

结果

术前风险组分层可预测患者生化和局部复发、全身进展以及癌症特异性生存率和总生存率的风险(各p<0.001)。与低风险患者相比,高危或中危疾病患者术后死于前列腺癌的风险比分别为11.5(95%CI 5.9至22.3,p<0.0001)和6.3(95%CI 3.3至12.3,p<0.0001)。在高危组患者中,活检Gleason评分(p=0.006)、病理Gleason评分(p=0.006)、病理肿瘤分期(p=0.04)、阳性淋巴结(p=0.02)和阳性手术切缘(p=0.008)可预测死于前列腺癌。

结论

我们验证了风险组分层预测根治性前列腺切除术后疾病进展和患者生存的能力。手术分期提供的额外预后信息可能有助于个体化的术后管理,特别是对于高危患者。

相似文献

1
Mayo Clinic validation of the D'amico risk group classification for predicting survival following radical prostatectomy.梅奥诊所对用于预测根治性前列腺切除术后生存率的达米科风险组分类法的验证。
J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1354-60; discussion 1360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.061. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
2
Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.前列腺特异性抗原时代,淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的长期预后。
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.048. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
3
Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.CAPRA评分预测根治性前列腺切除术后无生化复发生存率的有效性。来自欧洲1296例患者的多中心调查结果。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.043. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
4
Ability of 2 pretreatment risk assessment methods to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE.两种术前风险评估方法预测前列腺癌根治术后复发的能力:来自CaPSURE的数据。
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1126-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155535.25971.de.
5
The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy.活检与病理Gleason评分不一致对根治性前列腺切除术后生存的影响。
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):95-104; discussion 104. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.016. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
6
Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.临床分期T1前列腺癌的亚分类:对根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的影响。
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.153. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
7
Contemporary evaluation of the D'amico risk classification of prostate cancer.前列腺癌达米科风险分类的当代评估。
Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):931-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.055.
8
Biostatistical modeling using traditional preoperative and pathological prognostic variables in the selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.在前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后疾病复发高危男性的选择中,使用传统术前和病理预后变量进行生物统计学建模。
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):929-33.
9
Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.术前Gleason评分为8至10分的前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的临床和病理结果。
Cancer. 2006 Sep 15;107(6):1265-72. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22116.
10
The impact of positive surgical margins on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era.在 PSA 时代根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘对死亡率的影响。
J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):1003-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.039. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
External beam radiation therapy versus radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: protocol of the RECOVER study.高危前列腺癌的体外放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术:RECOVER研究方案
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13511-7.
2
Systematic review of prognostic models for predicting recurrence and survival in patients with treated oropharyngeal cancer.预测经治疗的口咽癌患者复发和生存的预后模型的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):e090393. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090393.
3
Enhancing risk stratification models in localized prostate cancer by novel validated tissue biomarkers.
通过新型验证的组织生物标志物增强局限性前列腺癌的风险分层模型。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00918-9.
4
Contemporary risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the active surveillance era.主动监测时代根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发的当代风险。
Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;42(6):175.e1-175.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
The Transcriptomic Profiles of and Stratify the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Primary Prostate Cancer beyond Clinical Features.和 的转录组谱可在临床特征之外对原发性前列腺癌的生化复发风险进行分层。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 7;24(9):8399. doi: 10.3390/ijms24098399.
6
15-year biochemical failure, metastasis, salvage therapy, and cancer-specific and overall survival rates in men treated with robotic radical prostatectomy for PSA-screen detected prostate cancer.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗 PSA 筛查前列腺癌患者的 15 年生化失败、转移、挽救治疗及癌症特异性和总生存率。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):778-786. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00674-2. Epub 2023 May 4.
7
Dose-escalated radiotherapy for clinically localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.剂量递增放疗治疗局限性和局部进展性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 8;3(3):CD012817. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012817.pub2.
8
Propensity score matching analysis comparing radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer.局部晚期前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与放疗联合雄激素剥夺治疗的倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 21;12(1):12480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16700-7.
9
SATB1, genomic instability and Gleason grading constitute a novel risk score for prostate cancer.SATB1、基因组不稳定性和 Gleason 分级构成了前列腺癌的新风险评分。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 27;11(1):24446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03702-0.
10
External validation of a magnetic resonance imaging-based algorithm for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.基于磁共振成像的预测前列腺癌侧别特异性包膜外侵犯算法的外部验证
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):327-333. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0128.R2. Epub 2021 Sep 18.