Ivey Gavin
Psychology Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Private bag 3, Johannesburg, Gauteng 2050, South Africa.
Int J Psychoanal. 2008 Feb;89(1):19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2007.00003.x.
This critical review of the current disputes concerning countertransference enactment systematically outlines the various issues and the perspectives adopted by the relevant psychoanalytic authors. In the light of this the 'common ground ' hypothesis concerning the unifying influence of contemporary countertransference theory is challenged. While the existence of enactments, minimally defined as the analyst's inadvertent actualization of the patient's transference fantasies, is widely accepted, controversies regarding the specific scope, nature, prevalence, relationship to countertransference experience, impact on the analytic process, role played by the analyst's subjectivity, and the correct handling of enactments abound. Rather than taking a stand based on ideological allegiance to any particular psychoanalytic school or philosophical position, the author argues that the relative merits of contending perspectives is best evaluated with reference to close process scrutiny of the context, manifestation and impact of specific enactments on patients' intrapsychic functioning and the analytic relationship. A detailed account of an interpretative enactment provides a context for the author's position on these debates.
这篇对当前关于反移情表现的争议的批判性综述系统地概述了各种问题以及相关精神分析作者所采用的观点。鉴于此，关于当代反移情理论统一影响的“共同基础”假说受到了挑战。虽然表现（最起码定义为分析师对患者移情幻想的无意实现）的存在已被广泛接受，但关于其具体范围、性质、普遍性、与反移情体验的关系、对分析过程的影响、分析师主观性所起的作用以及对表现的正确处理等方面存在诸多争议。作者并非基于对任何特定精神分析学派或哲学立场的意识形态忠诚来表明立场，而是认为，通过对特定表现在患者心理功能和分析关系中的背景、表现及影响进行密切的过程审视，才能最好地评估相互竞争观点的相对优点。对一次解释性表现的详细描述为作者在这些辩论中的立场提供了背景。
