Davey P G, Williams A H
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Apr;27 Suppl B:69-73. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_b.69.
Safety of teicoplanin has been assessed in 3377 patients treated in Europe up to the end of June 1990. One or more adverse events were experienced by 10% of patients. Age and teicoplanin dose had no significant effect on the incidence or type of adverse event. In comparative trials the incidence and profile of adverse events to teicoplanin have been similar to those seen with beta-lactam therapy. Impaired renal function occurred consistently more frequently with vancomycin therapy than with teicoplanin therapy, particularly when these drugs were co-administered with aminoglycosides. Severe skin reactions have not been reported with teicoplanin, which, unlike vancomycin, does not cause infusion rate-related release of histamine. These data provide further evidence that teicoplanin is safer than vancomycin and does not have dose-related adverse effects in the dose range 3-10 mg/kg.
截至1990年6月底,在欧洲接受治疗的3377例患者中对替考拉宁的安全性进行了评估。10%的患者经历了一种或多种不良事件。年龄和替考拉宁剂量对不良事件的发生率或类型没有显著影响。在比较试验中,替考拉宁不良事件的发生率和特征与β-内酰胺类治疗所见相似。万古霉素治疗比替考拉宁治疗更常出现肾功能损害,尤其是当这些药物与氨基糖苷类药物联合使用时。替考拉宁尚未报告有严重的皮肤反应,与万古霉素不同,它不会引起与输注速度相关的组胺释放。这些数据进一步证明,替考拉宁比万古霉素更安全,在3-10mg/kg的剂量范围内没有剂量相关的不良反应。