Baumann Hans Joerg, Kluge Stefan, Balke Lorenz, Yekebas Emre, Izbicki Jakob R, Amthor Michael, Kreymann Georg, Meyer Andreas
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany.
Surgery. 2008 Mar;143(3):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
The utility of open lung biopsy (OLB) in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of unknown origin has been questioned because of its potentially low diagnostic yield and possibly related morbidity. To quantify possible benefits and risks, and especially so for bedside lung biopsy, we reviewed retrospectively our 8-year, single unit experience with this procedure.
Mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure of unknown origin who underwent OLB were analyzed in a retrospective, single-center, cohort study in a medical intensive care unit in a university medical center.
Twenty-seven patients were analyzed (15 female, 12 male, of mean 48 years [standard deviation, 14]), 67% of whom were immunocompromised. All patients underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage before OLB. PaO2/Fraction of inspired oxygen at the time of biopsy was 188 +/- 109 mm Hg. Biopsies were performed in the operating room on 9 patients and at bedside on 18. A specific diagnosis was obtained in 70% of biopsies. Biopsy results led to alteration in treatment in 81% of patients. Minor complications occurred in 52% of patients and major complications in 7%. The rate of complications did not appear to differ with the location of the procedure (bedside vs operating room). No deaths were attributed to the procedure.
Bedside OLB can be performed safely in selected, mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients with ALI or ARDS. Our results support the concept that lung biopsy often leads to management alterations in patients where a standardized diagnostic workup failed to yield a definitive diagnosis.
对于病因不明的急性肺损伤(ALI)或急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的机械通气患者,开放式肺活检(OLB)的实用性受到质疑,因为其诊断率可能较低且可能存在相关并发症。为了量化可能的益处和风险,尤其是对于床旁肺活检,我们回顾性分析了我们在8年时间里在单一机构进行该操作的经验。
在一所大学医学中心的医疗重症监护病房进行的一项回顾性、单中心队列研究中,分析了接受OLB的病因不明的机械通气、危重症急性呼吸衰竭患者。
共分析了27例患者(15例女性,12例男性,平均年龄48岁[标准差14岁]),其中67%为免疫功能低下患者。所有患者在OLB前均接受了支气管镜检查和支气管肺泡灌洗。活检时的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数为188±109 mmHg。9例患者在手术室进行活检,18例在床旁进行。70%的活检获得了明确诊断。活检结果导致81%的患者治疗方案改变。52%的患者发生了轻微并发症,7%的患者发生了严重并发症。并发症发生率似乎与操作地点(床旁与手术室)无关。没有死亡病例归因于该操作。
对于选定的患有ALI或ARDS的机械通气危重症患者,可以安全地进行床旁OLB。我们的结果支持这样的观点,即对于标准化诊断检查未能得出明确诊断的患者,肺活检通常会导致治疗方案的改变。