Suppr超能文献

肝硬化预后评估。

Assessment of prognosis of cirrhosis.

作者信息

Durand François, Valla Dominique

机构信息

Pôle des Maladies del' Appareil Digestif, Service d'Hépatologie, Université Paris VII, INSERM, U773, Centre de Recherche Biomédicale Bichat Beaujon CRB3, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.

出版信息

Semin Liver Dis. 2008 Feb;28(1):110-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1040325.

Abstract

Once patients with cirrhosis experience decompensation, early mortality risk increases sharply. Liver transplantation has transformed the prognosis of decompensated cirrhosis. Child-Pugh score has been the reference for many years for assessing the prognosis of cirrhosis. However, Child-Pugh score has important limitations among which is subjective interpretation of some of its variables, making it difficult to categorize patients according to their own disease severity. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, which was originally designed for assessing the prognosis of cirrhotic patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), is a continuous score relying on three objective variables. Along with TIPS, MELD score proved to be a robust marker of early mortality across a wide spectrum of causes of cirrhosis, even though 10 to 20% of patients are still misclassified. MELD is especially useful for prioritizing candidates for transplantation according to a "sickest first" policy. However, MELD is not a universal prognostic marker of cirrhosis and several MELD exceptions require more specific approaches.

摘要

一旦肝硬化患者出现失代偿,早期死亡风险会急剧增加。肝移植改变了失代偿期肝硬化的预后。多年来,Child-Pugh评分一直是评估肝硬化预后的参考指标。然而,Child-Pugh评分存在重要局限性,其中之一是对某些变量的主观解读,这使得难以根据患者自身的疾病严重程度对其进行分类。终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分最初是为评估接受经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的肝硬化患者的预后而设计的,它是一个基于三个客观变量的连续评分。与TIPS一起,MELD评分被证明是各种肝硬化病因早期死亡的有力指标,尽管仍有10%至20%的患者被错误分类。MELD对于根据“病情最严重者优先”政策对移植候选人进行排序特别有用。然而,MELD并非肝硬化的通用预后指标,一些MELD例外情况需要更具体的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验