Diallo Jean-Simon, Aldejmah Abdulhadi, Mouhim Abdelali Filali, Fahmy Mona Alam, Koumakpayi Ismaël Hervé, Sircar Kanishka, Bégin Louis R, Mes-Masson Anne-Marie, Saad Fred
Centre de recherche du centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), Institut du cancer de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
BJU Int. 2008 May;101(10):1302-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07514.x. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
To address, by co-assessing cytoplasmic and nuclear androgen receptor (AR) expression in prostate tissues, the contribution of the AR throughout the stages of prostate cancer (PC) and its value as a marker for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP).
Archival prostate specimens from patients who were cancer-free (43), with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC, 62), and with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC, 30) were used to construct tissue microarrays (total 135). Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and non-neoplastic tissues (NA) found adjacent to HSPC were also included. Nuclear and cytoplasmic AR expression was scored by two observers using a composite scale, after immunohistochemical detection of the AR. The nuclear/cytoplasmic AR expression ratio was also calculated. Univariate Kaplan-Meier plots, and multivariate Cox and survival-tree analyses, were then used to assess the ability of the AR to predict BCR in the patients with HSPC.
There was markedly greater nuclear AR staining intensity in NA than in normal prostate tissues from cancer-free patients. Cytoplasmic AR expression was highest in AIPC and markedly more than in HSPC. The nuclear/cytoplasmic AR expression ratio was highest in NA and PIN. In univariate analyses, a low nuclear AR, low cytoplasmic AR, and a high nuclear/cytoplasmic AR expression ratio were associated with BCR. Although cytoplasmic AR was an independent predictor of BCR in a Cox multivariate model (hazard ratio 2.736, 95% confidence interval 1.228-6.091, P = 0.014), survival-tree analyses suggested a complex relationship between AR expression and clinicopathological features.
We propose that increased nuclear AR expression might be a precursor to PC and that cytoplasmic AR could contribute to the AIPC phenotype. The predictive ability of the AR might be closely linked to clinicopathological features.
通过共同评估前列腺组织中细胞质和细胞核雄激素受体(AR)的表达,探讨AR在前列腺癌(PC)各阶段的作用及其作为预测根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后生化复发(BCR)标志物的价值。
使用来自无癌患者(43例)、激素敏感性前列腺癌(HSPC,62例)和雄激素非依赖性前列腺癌(AIPC,30例)的存档前列腺标本构建组织微阵列(共135个)。还纳入了HSPC附近发现的前列腺上皮内瘤变(PIN)和非肿瘤组织(NA)。在免疫组织化学检测AR后,由两名观察者使用综合评分量表对细胞核和细胞质AR表达进行评分。还计算了细胞核/细胞质AR表达比值。然后使用单变量Kaplan-Meier图、多变量Cox分析和生存树分析来评估AR预测HSPC患者BCR的能力。
NA中细胞核AR染色强度明显高于无癌患者的正常前列腺组织。细胞质AR表达在AIPC中最高,明显高于HSPC。细胞核/细胞质AR表达比值在NA和PIN中最高。在单变量分析中,低细胞核AR、低细胞质AR和高细胞核/细胞质AR表达比值与BCR相关。尽管在Cox多变量模型中细胞质AR是BCR的独立预测因子(风险比2.736,95%置信区间1.228 - 6.091,P = 0.014),但生存树分析表明AR表达与临床病理特征之间存在复杂关系。
我们提出细胞核AR表达增加可能是PC的先兆,而细胞质AR可能促成AIPC表型。AR的预测能力可能与临床病理特征密切相关。