• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于组织微阵列芯的 Gleason 评分的多机构验证。

A Multi-Institutional Validation of Gleason Score Derived from Tissue Microarray Cores.

机构信息

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.

Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jul;25(3):979-986. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0408-6. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1007/s12253-018-0408-6
PMID:29623528
Abstract

To test the agreement between high-grade PCa at RP and TMA, and the ability of TMA to predict BCR. Validation of concordance between tissue microarray (TMA) and radical prostatectomy (RP) high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial because latter determines the treated natural history of PCa. We hypothesized that TMA Gleason score is in agreement with RP pathology and capable of accurately predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR). Data were provided from a multi-institutional Canadian sample of 1333 TMA and RP specimens with complete clinicopathological data. First, rate of agreement between TMA and high-grade Gleason at RP or biopsy and RP was tested. Second, ability of RP, TMA and biopsy to predict BCR was compared. Multivariable (MVA) Cox regression models were fitted and BCR rates were illustrated with Kaplan-Meier plots. Agreement between RP and TMA and between RP and biopsy was 72.6% (95% CI:69.7-75.5) and 60.4% (95% CI:57.2-63.6), respectively. In MVA predicting BCR, the accuracy for RP, TMA and biopsy was 0.73, 0.72 and 0.68, respectively. TMA added discriminatory ability among exclusively low-grade Gleason RP patients (p = 0.02), but did not improve BCR discrimination in exclusive high-grade PCa RP patients (p = 0.8). TMA Gleason grade accurately reflects presence of high-grade Gleason in RP specimen, accurately predicts BCR rates after RP and improves prediction of BCR in low-grade Gleason patients at RP.

摘要

为了测试 RP 中高级别前列腺癌与 TMA 的一致性,以及 TMA 预测 BCR 的能力,验证组织微阵列(TMA)和根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中高级别前列腺癌(PCa)之间的一致性非常重要,因为后者决定了 PCa 的治疗自然史。我们假设 TMA 的 Gleason 评分与 RP 病理一致,并且能够准确预测生化复发(BCR)。该数据来自加拿大的多机构样本,其中包括 1333 例 TMA 和 RP 标本,具有完整的临床病理数据。首先,测试了 TMA 与 RP 或活检中的高级别 Gleason 之间的一致性。其次,比较了 RP、TMA 和活检预测 BCR 的能力。采用多变量(MVA)Cox 回归模型进行拟合,并通过 Kaplan-Meier 图展示 BCR 率。RP 与 TMA 之间以及 RP 与活检之间的一致性分别为 72.6%(95%CI:69.7-75.5)和 60.4%(95%CI:57.2-63.6)。在 MVA 预测 BCR 中,RP、TMA 和活检的准确性分别为 0.73、0.72 和 0.68。TMA 在仅为低级别 Gleason 的 RP 患者中增加了判别能力(p=0.02),但在仅为高级别 PCa 的 RP 患者中并未改善 BCR 判别能力(p=0.8)。TMA Gleason 分级准确反映了 RP 标本中高级别 Gleason 的存在,准确预测了 RP 后 BCR 率,并改善了 RP 中低级别 Gleason 患者的 BCR 预测。

相似文献

1
A Multi-Institutional Validation of Gleason Score Derived from Tissue Microarray Cores.基于组织微阵列芯的 Gleason 评分的多机构验证。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jul;25(3):979-986. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0408-6. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
3
Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study.前列腺癌新分级组的预后价值:一项多机构欧洲验证研究
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Jun;20(2):197-202. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.66. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
4
Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.与格里森评分相比,高级别肿瘤体积百分比并不能显著改善根治性前列腺切除术后早期生化复发的预测。
BJU Int. 2014 Mar;113(3):399-407. doi: 10.1111/bju.12424. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
5
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.一种当代前列腺癌分级系统:格里森评分的有效替代方案。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
6
The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.2005年国际泌尿病理学会 Gleason 分级共识指南的影响——配对分析
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):883-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13439. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.新的前列腺癌分级系统可预测 Gleason 评分 8-10 级前列腺癌手术后的长期生存情况。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):907-912. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
8
The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study.新的前列腺癌分级系统不能改善前列腺癌根治术后临床复发的预测:一项大型双中心验证研究的结果
Prostate. 2017 Feb;77(3):263-273. doi: 10.1002/pros.23265. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies.根治性前列腺切除术和辅助放疗后 pT3N0 前列腺癌患者早期生化复发的模式和预测因素:对多模式治疗的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):960-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
10
Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.初始 Gleason 分级对前列腺癌主动监测期间结局的影响。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence unravels interpretable malignancy grades of prostate cancer on histology images.人工智能在组织学图像上解析可解释的前列腺癌恶性等级。
Npj Imaging. 2024 Mar 6;2(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s44303-023-00005-z.
2
Validation of the prognostic value of NF-κB p65 in prostate cancer: A retrospective study using a large multi-institutional cohort of the Canadian Prostate Cancer Biomarker Network.验证 NF-κB p65 在前列腺癌中的预后价值:利用加拿大前列腺癌生物标志物网络的大型多机构队列进行的回顾性研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 2;16(7):e1002847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002847. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
The Terry Fox Research Institute Canadian Prostate Cancer Biomarker Network: an analysis of a pan-Canadian multi-center cohort for biomarker validation.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of active surveillance uptake for low-risk localized prostate cancer in Canada: a Canadian multi-institutional study.加拿大低风险局限性前列腺癌主动监测的应用分析:一项加拿大多机构研究。
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1897-0. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
2
Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins.肿瘤体积改善了局限性前列腺癌手术切缘阳性患者根治性前列腺切除术后无生化复发生存的长期预测。
World J Urol. 2017 Feb;35(2):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1861-z. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
特里·福克斯研究所以及加拿大前列腺癌生物标志物网络:一项用于生物标志物验证的全加性多中心队列分析。
BMC Urol. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0392-x.
Overexpression of the Long Non-coding RNA SChLAP1 Independently Predicts Lethal Prostate Cancer.
长链非编码RNA SChLAP1的过表达独立预测致命性前列腺癌。
Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):549-552. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
4
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.在全国基于人群的队列中对2015年Gleason分级组进行评估。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.036. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
5
Genomic Correlates to the Newly Proposed Grading Prognostic Groups for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌新提出的分级预后分组的基因组相关性
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):557-560. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.040. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.前列腺活检和前列腺切除标本中 Gleason 分级定量的临床应用
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):592-598. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.029. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
7
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
8
Prostate Cancer Screening Biomarkers: An Emerging Embarrassment of 'Riches'?前列腺癌筛查生物标志物:“丰富多样”的新尴尬?
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):54-55. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
The UGT2B28 Sex-steroid Inactivation Pathway Is a Regulator of Steroidogenesis and Modifies the Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression.UGT2B28 性类固醇失活途径是类固醇生成的调节因子,并改变前列腺癌进展风险。
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):601-609. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.054. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
10
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.一种当代前列腺癌分级系统:格里森评分的有效替代方案。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 10.