Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jul;25(3):979-986. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0408-6. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
To test the agreement between high-grade PCa at RP and TMA, and the ability of TMA to predict BCR. Validation of concordance between tissue microarray (TMA) and radical prostatectomy (RP) high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial because latter determines the treated natural history of PCa. We hypothesized that TMA Gleason score is in agreement with RP pathology and capable of accurately predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR). Data were provided from a multi-institutional Canadian sample of 1333 TMA and RP specimens with complete clinicopathological data. First, rate of agreement between TMA and high-grade Gleason at RP or biopsy and RP was tested. Second, ability of RP, TMA and biopsy to predict BCR was compared. Multivariable (MVA) Cox regression models were fitted and BCR rates were illustrated with Kaplan-Meier plots. Agreement between RP and TMA and between RP and biopsy was 72.6% (95% CI:69.7-75.5) and 60.4% (95% CI:57.2-63.6), respectively. In MVA predicting BCR, the accuracy for RP, TMA and biopsy was 0.73, 0.72 and 0.68, respectively. TMA added discriminatory ability among exclusively low-grade Gleason RP patients (p = 0.02), but did not improve BCR discrimination in exclusive high-grade PCa RP patients (p = 0.8). TMA Gleason grade accurately reflects presence of high-grade Gleason in RP specimen, accurately predicts BCR rates after RP and improves prediction of BCR in low-grade Gleason patients at RP.
为了测试 RP 中高级别前列腺癌与 TMA 的一致性,以及 TMA 预测 BCR 的能力,验证组织微阵列(TMA)和根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中高级别前列腺癌(PCa)之间的一致性非常重要,因为后者决定了 PCa 的治疗自然史。我们假设 TMA 的 Gleason 评分与 RP 病理一致,并且能够准确预测生化复发(BCR)。该数据来自加拿大的多机构样本,其中包括 1333 例 TMA 和 RP 标本,具有完整的临床病理数据。首先,测试了 TMA 与 RP 或活检中的高级别 Gleason 之间的一致性。其次,比较了 RP、TMA 和活检预测 BCR 的能力。采用多变量(MVA)Cox 回归模型进行拟合,并通过 Kaplan-Meier 图展示 BCR 率。RP 与 TMA 之间以及 RP 与活检之间的一致性分别为 72.6%(95%CI:69.7-75.5)和 60.4%(95%CI:57.2-63.6)。在 MVA 预测 BCR 中,RP、TMA 和活检的准确性分别为 0.73、0.72 和 0.68。TMA 在仅为低级别 Gleason 的 RP 患者中增加了判别能力(p=0.02),但在仅为高级别 PCa 的 RP 患者中并未改善 BCR 判别能力(p=0.8)。TMA Gleason 分级准确反映了 RP 标本中高级别 Gleason 的存在,准确预测了 RP 后 BCR 率,并改善了 RP 中低级别 Gleason 患者的 BCR 预测。