Szabo Robert M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Feb;33(2):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.11.002.
Reporting outcomes based on clinical evidence is going to set the standards for hand surgery practice. Hand surgeons will be judged by the evidence that their interventions are doing the most good for the most people at a price that patients and/or insurance companies are willing to pay. Evidence-based practice is the integration of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. The best evidence comes from randomized clinical trials, which are expensive, time consuming, and not always possible. Sometimes we have to settle for good evidence, which may be the best evidence that is available. Nevertheless, if the future demands good evidence, then as hand surgeons and researchers we need to supply that evidence. Thus, first we have to know how and where to look for what's out there and then what we can do to add to this body of knowledge.
基于临床证据报告结果将为手外科实践设定标准。手外科医生将依据这样的证据来评判:他们的干预措施以患者和/或保险公司愿意支付的价格,为最多的人带来最大的益处。循证医学实践是将最佳研究证据与临床专业知识及患者价值观相结合。最佳证据来自随机临床试验,这类试验成本高、耗时久,且并非总是可行。有时我们不得不满足于良好的证据,这可能是现有的最佳证据。然而,如果未来需要良好的证据,那么作为手外科医生和研究人员,我们就需要提供这样的证据。因此,首先我们必须知道如何以及在哪里寻找现有信息,然后思考我们能做些什么来增加这方面的知识。