Suppr超能文献

家用和社区环境中电动轮椅使用情况的特征分析

Characterization of power wheelchair use in the home and community.

作者信息

Sonenblum Sharon E, Sprigle Stephen, Harris Frances H, Maurer Christine L

机构信息

Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.029.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the use of power wheelchairs and to determine if multiple measures of mobility and occupancy jointly provide a more comprehensive picture of wheelchair usage and daily activity in full-time power wheelchair users than daily distance alone.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Subjects' everyday mobility was measured in their homes and communities for 2 weeks, and prompted recall interviews were conducted by phone.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample (N=25) of nonambulatory, full-time power wheelchair users.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Wheelchair usage was logged electronically, and geolocation and interview data were used to isolate chair use to (1) in the home, (2) not in the home indoors, or (3) outdoors. Distance wheeled, time spent wheeling, number of bouts, time spent in the wheelchair, and the percentage of time in the wheelchair spent wheeling were measured to describe wheelchair use.

RESULTS

The median wheelchair user spent 10.6 hours (range, 5.0-16.6h) in his/her wheelchair daily and wheeled 1.085 km (range, 0.238-10.585 km) over 58 minutes (range, 16-173 min) and 110 bouts (range, 36-282 bouts). Wheelchair use varied across subjects, within subjects from day to day, and between environments. Mobility bouts outdoors were longer and faster than those wheeled indoors. In a regression analysis, distance wheeled explained only 33% of the variation in the number of bouts and 75% in the time spent wheeling.

CONCLUSIONS

Power wheelchair use varies widely both within and between users. Measuring distance, time, and number of bouts provides a clearer picture of mobility patterns than measuring distance alone, whereas occupancy helps to measure wheelchair function in daily activities.

摘要

目的

描述电动轮椅的使用情况,并确定与仅测量每日行驶距离相比,多项移动性和占用情况指标是否能共同更全面地反映全职电动轮椅使用者的轮椅使用情况和日常活动。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

在受试者家中和社区测量其日常移动性,为期2周,并通过电话进行提示性回忆访谈。

参与者

非步行全职电动轮椅使用者的便利样本(N = 25)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

通过电子记录轮椅使用情况,并利用地理定位和访谈数据将轮椅使用情况分为(1)在家中,(2)不在家中但在室内,或(3)在户外。测量行驶距离、轮椅行驶时间、出行次数、坐在轮椅上的时间,以及坐在轮椅上时用于行驶的时间百分比,以描述轮椅使用情况。

结果

电动轮椅使用者中位数每天坐在轮椅上的时间为10.6小时(范围5.0 - 16.6小时),在58分钟(范围16 - 173分钟)内行驶1.085公里(范围0.238 - 10.585公里),出行110次(范围36 - 282次)。轮椅使用情况在不同受试者之间、同一受试者不同日期之间以及不同环境之间存在差异(此处“varied across subjects, within subjects from day to day, and between environments”重复了,根据语境,推测是笔误,调整为“在不同受试者之间、同一受试者不同日期之间以及不同环境之间存在差异”)。户外的移动出行比室内行驶的时间更长、速度更快。在回归分析中,行驶距离仅解释了出行次数变化的33%和行驶时间的75%。

结论

电动轮椅的使用在使用者内部和使用者之间差异很大。测量距离、时间和出行次数比仅测量距离能更清晰地呈现移动模式,而占用情况有助于衡量日常活动中轮椅的功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验