Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh HealthCare System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 May;91(5):759-64. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.009.
To determine the minimum space required for wheeled mobility device users to perform 4 maneuverability tasks and to investigate the impact of selected design attributes on space.
Case series.
University laboratory, Veterans Affairs research facility, vocational training center, and a national wheelchair sport event.
The sample of convenience included manual wheelchair (MWC; n=109), power wheelchair (PWC; n=100), and scooter users (n=14).
A mock environment was constructed to create passageways to form an L-turn, 360 degrees -turn in place, and a U-turn with and without a barrier. Passageway openings were increased in 5-cm increments until the user could successfully perform each task without hitting the walls. Structural dimensions of the device and user were collected using an electromechanical probe. Mobility devices were grouped into categories based on design features and compared using 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc pairwise Bonferroni-corrected tests.
Minimum passageway widths for the 4 maneuverability tasks.
Ultralight MWCs with rear axles posterior to the shoulder had the shortest lengths and required the least amount of space compared with all other types of MWCs (P<.05). Mid-wheel-drive PWCs required the least space for the 360 degrees -turn in place compared with front-wheel-drive and rear-wheel-drive PWCs (P<.01) but performed equally as well as front-wheel-drive models on all other turning tasks. PWCs with seat functions required more space to perform the tasks.
Between 10% and 100% of users would not be able to maneuver in spaces that meet current Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities specifications. This study provides data that can be used to support wheelchair prescription and home modifications and to update standards to improve the accessibility of public areas.
确定轮式移动设备用户执行 4 项机动性任务所需的最小空间,并研究选定设计属性对空间的影响。
病例系列。
大学实验室、退伍军人事务研究设施、职业培训中心和全国轮椅运动赛事。
方便样本包括手动轮椅(MWC;n=109)、电动轮椅(PWC;n=100)和滑板车使用者(n=14)。
构建了一个模拟环境,以创建形成 L 形转弯、原地 360 度转弯和带/不带障碍物的 U 形转弯的通道。通道开口以 5 厘米的增量增加,直到用户可以成功完成每个任务而不会撞到墙壁。使用机电探头收集设备和用户的结构尺寸。根据设计特点将移动设备分为几类,并使用单向方差分析和事后两两 Bonferroni 校正检验进行比较。
4 项机动性任务的最小通道宽度。
与所有其他类型的 MWC 相比,后轴位于肩部后方的超轻 MWC 具有最短的长度和最小的空间需求(P<.05)。与前驱动和后驱动 PWC 相比,中轮驱动 PWC 进行原地 360 度转弯所需的空间最小(P<.01),但在所有其他转弯任务中表现与前驱动型号相同。具有座椅功能的 PWC 执行任务所需的空间更大。
在满足当前《建筑和设施无障碍指南》规格的空间中,有 10%到 100%的用户将无法进行操作。本研究提供的数据可用于支持轮椅处方和家庭改造,并更新标准以提高公共区域的可达性。