Pérez-Nueno Violeta I, Ritchie David W, Rabal Obdulia, Pascual Rosalia, Borrell Jose I, Teixidó Jordi
Grup d'Enginyeria Molecular, Institut Químic de SarriA (IQS), Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Mar;48(3):509-33. doi: 10.1021/ci700415g. Epub 2008 Feb 26.
HIV infection is initiated by fusion of the virus with the target cell through binding of the viral gp120 protein with the CD4 cell surface receptor protein and the CXCR4 or CCR5 co-receptors. There is currently considerable interest in developing novel ligands that can modulate the conformations of these co-receptors and, hence, ultimately block virus-cell fusion. This article describes a detailed comparison of the performance of receptor-based and ligand-based virtual screening approaches to find CXCR4 and CCR5 antagonists that could potentially serve as HIV entry inhibitors. Because no crystal structures for these proteins are available, homology models of CXCR4 and CCR5 have been built, using bovine rhodopsin as the template. For ligand-based virtual screening, several shape-based and property-based molecular comparison approaches have been compared, using high-affinity ligands as query molecules. These methods were compared by virtually screening a library assembled by us, consisting of 602 known CXCR4 and CCR5 inhibitors and some 4700 similar presumed inactive molecules. For each receptor, the library was queried using known binders, and the enrichment factors and diversity of the resulting virtual hit lists were analyzed. Overall, ligand-based shape-matching searches yielded higher enrichments than receptor-based docking, especially for CXCR4. The results obtained for CCR5 suggest the possibility that different active scaffolds bind in different ways within the CCR5 pocket.
HIV感染是通过病毒的gp120蛋白与CD4细胞表面受体蛋白以及CXCR4或CCR5共受体结合,使病毒与靶细胞融合而引发的。目前,人们对开发新型配体以调节这些共受体的构象从而最终阻断病毒-细胞融合有着浓厚的兴趣。本文详细比较了基于受体和基于配体的虚拟筛选方法在寻找可能作为HIV进入抑制剂的CXCR4和CCR5拮抗剂方面的性能。由于这些蛋白质没有晶体结构,因此以牛视紫红质为模板构建了CXCR4和CCR5的同源模型。对于基于配体的虚拟筛选,使用高亲和力配体作为查询分子,比较了几种基于形状和基于性质的分子比较方法。通过虚拟筛选我们组装的一个文库对这些方法进行了比较,该文库由602种已知的CXCR4和CCR5抑制剂以及约4700种类似的假定无活性分子组成。对于每种受体,使用已知的结合剂查询文库,并分析所得虚拟命中列表的富集因子和多样性。总体而言,基于配体的形状匹配搜索比基于受体的对接产生了更高的富集,尤其是对于CXCR4。CCR5的结果表明,不同的活性支架可能以不同的方式结合在CCR5口袋内。