• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼笼的生存率及与失败相关因素的分析。

Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

作者信息

Sembrano Jonathan N, Cheng Edward Y

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Avenue S, R200, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jul;466(7):1657-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0183-x. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-008-0183-x
PMID:18299946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2505268/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The reported results of acetabular cage reconstruction for pelvic deficiency are widely variable. Our primary question was: what is the survivorship of cage reconstruction with a primary end point of cage revision and secondary end points of radiographic loosening and any reoperation? Secondary questions were: which factors predict cage failure, and what is the functional outcome (SF-36, WOMAC, Harris hip score) of this reconstructive method? We reviewed 72 cage reconstructions in 68 patients. Minimum followup was 1.2 years (mean, 5.1 years; range, 1.2-10.7 years). Five-year cage revision-free survivorship was 87.8%. Five-year loosening-free and acetabular reoperation-free survivorships were 80.7% and 81.3%, respectively. No single preoperative factor (age, gender, severity of pelvic defect, degree of heterotopic ossification, difference in limb lengths and centers of rotation) or intraoperative factor (type of bone graft, type of cage, changes in limb length and center of rotation) predicted cage failure. Functional outcomes were 28.9 (SF-36 Physical Component), 52.4 (SF-36 Mental Component), 33.7 (WOMAC), and 44.2 (Harris). We judged these outcomes acceptable for this sometimes challenging problem. Future techniques for treating pelvic deficiency will need to be compared with these and other outcomes in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

摘要

未标注

据报道,髋臼笼重建治疗骨盆缺损的结果差异很大。我们的主要问题是:以髋臼笼翻修为主要终点、影像学松动和再次手术为次要终点时,髋臼笼重建的生存率如何?次要问题是:哪些因素可预测髋臼笼失败,以及这种重建方法的功能结局(SF-36、WOMAC、Harris髋关节评分)如何?我们回顾了68例患者的72次髋臼笼重建。最短随访时间为1.2年(平均5.1年;范围1.2 - 10.7年)。5年无髋臼笼翻修生存率为87.8%。5年无松动和无髋臼再次手术生存率分别为80.7%和81.3%。没有单一的术前因素(年龄、性别、骨盆缺损严重程度、异位骨化程度、肢体长度和旋转中心差异)或术中因素(骨移植类型、髋臼笼类型、肢体长度和旋转中心变化)可预测髋臼笼失败。功能结局为28.9(SF-36身体成分)、52.4(SF-36心理成分)、33.7(WOMAC)和44.2(Harris)。我们认为这些结局对于这个有时具有挑战性的问题来说是可以接受的。未来治疗骨盆缺损的技术需要与文献中的这些及其他结局进行比较。

证据水平

IV级,治疗性研究。

相似文献

1
Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.髋臼笼的生存率及与失败相关因素的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jul;466(7):1657-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0183-x. Epub 2008 Feb 26.
2
The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.增强型模块化笼重建系统治疗严重髋臼缺损:两年临床和影像学结果。
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2269-2278. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4271-6. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.翻修髋关节置换术中重建性骨笼和颗粒同种异体移植物联合应用治疗 Paprosky Ⅲ型髋臼骨缺损的中远期疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2915-3.
4
Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.杯笼重建治疗严重髋臼骨缺损和骨盆不连续:35 例连续病例的中期结果。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1442-1448. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0481.R1.
5
LUMiC Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection: Short-term Results.髋臼周围肿瘤切除术后的LUMiC人工关节重建:短期结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):686-695. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4805-4.
6
The Evolution of the Cup-Cage Technique for Major Acetabular Defects: Full and Half Cup-Cage Reconstruction.杯-笼技术在髋臼大缺损中的演变:全杯-笼和半杯-笼重建。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jul 5;99(13):1104-1110. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00821.
7
Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.钽金属组件用于复杂髋臼翻修术的5至10年生存率良好:对先前报告的长期随访
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):336-342. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000005.
8
Is an Acetabular Cage and Cement Fixation Sufficiently Durable for the Treatment of Destructive Acetabular Metastases?髋臼笼和水泥固定治疗破坏性髋臼转移瘤是否足够耐用?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1459-1465. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000725.
9
Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.多孔钽组件在PaproskyⅡ型和Ⅲ型髋臼翻修术中的应用。对51例髋关节进行至少五年的随访。
Int Orthop. 2017 May;41(5):911-916. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3312-2. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.使用杯笼结构治疗大型髋臼缺损和骨盆连续性中断的中期结果令人鼓舞。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):408-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4210-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Acetabular Reconstruction Rings in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.髋臼重建环在复杂初次及翻修全髋关节置换术中的临床及影像学结果
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Jun 11;55(5):1267-1276. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00436-z. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Outcome and EBRA migration analysis of a reconstruction cage in acetabular revision arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study.重建笼在髋臼翻修术中的应用:临床与放射学研究结果及 EBRA 迁移分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Mar;141(3):509-516. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03722-x. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.翻修髋关节置换术中重建性骨笼和颗粒同种异体移植物联合应用治疗 Paprosky Ⅲ型髋臼骨缺损的中远期疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2915-3.
4
Is an Acetabular Cage and Cement Fixation Sufficiently Durable for the Treatment of Destructive Acetabular Metastases?髋臼笼和水泥固定治疗破坏性髋臼转移瘤是否足够耐用?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1459-1465. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000725.
5
ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION IN PAPROSKY TYPE III DEFECTS.帕罗斯基III型缺损的髋臼重建
Acta Ortop Bras. 2019 Jan-Feb;27(1):59-63. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220192701187313.
6
Reconstructing Pelvic Discontinuity and Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty with a Massive Allograft and Cage.使用大块同种异体骨和髋臼杯重建翻修髋关节置换术中的骨盆不连续和严重髋臼骨缺损。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2016 Aug 24;6(3):e30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00026. eCollection 2016 Sep 28.
7
[Effectiveness of acetabular revision using a metal reconstruction cage].[使用金属重建髋臼杯进行髋臼翻修的有效性]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 15;31(6):641-646. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201701017.
8
Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity.慢性骨盆不连续的治疗选择。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Reconstruction of acetabulum in revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity: report of a difficult case requiring four revision arthroplasty.骨盆连续性中断的翻修全髋关节置换术中髋臼重建:1例需4次翻修置换的疑难病例报告
Springerplus. 2016 May 11;5:597. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2247-9. eCollection 2016.
10
Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.髋臼重建的临床评估与手术选择:文献综述
J Orthop. 2015 Nov 2;12(Suppl 2):S238-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.10.011. eCollection 2015 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages.髋臼笼治疗骨盆不连续
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:183-7. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246530.52253.7b.
2
Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.使用小梁金属髋臼部件进行髋臼翻修治疗与骨盆连续性中断相关的严重髋臼骨缺损。
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.015.
3
The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects.使用小梁金属髋臼组件和小梁金属增强物治疗严重髋臼缺损。
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):83-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.008.
4
Restoration of acetabular bone loss 2005.2005年髋臼骨缺损的修复
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Jun;21(4 Suppl 1):117-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.006.
5
Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency: the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.严重髋臼骨缺损的重建:Burch-Schneider防髋臼突出笼在初次和翻修全髋关节置换术中的应用
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Jun;21(4):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.016.
6
Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips.多孔钽非骨水泥髋臼杯在髋关节翻修置换术中的评估:60例髋关节的临床和影像学结果
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Dec;20(8):1002-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.01.023.
7
Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty.模块化多孔金属增强物用于髋关节翻修术中严重髋臼骨缺损的治疗。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec(429):201-8. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150133.88271.80.
8
The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip.结构性移植骨和椎间融合器在髋关节翻修置换术中的当前作用。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec(429):193-200. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000149822.49890.5e.
9
Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中髂坐骨重建环的并发症
J Arthroplasty. 2004 Jun;19(4):436-46. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.11.015.
10
Antiprotrusio cages for acetabular revision.用于髋臼翻修的防髋臼突出笼
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar(420):106-12. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00015.