Delhey Kaspar, Peters Anne
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Radolfzell, Germany.
PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001689.
Increased variability in sexually selected ornaments, a key assumption of evolutionary theory, is thought to be maintained through condition-dependence. Condition-dependent handicap models of sexual selection predict that (a) sexually selected traits show amplified variability compared to equivalent non-sexually selected traits, and since males are usually the sexually selected sex, that (b) males are more variable than females, and (c) sexually dimorphic traits more variable than monomorphic ones. So far these predictions have only been tested for metric traits. Surprisingly, they have not been examined for bright coloration, one of the most prominent sexual traits. This omission stems from computational difficulties: different types of colours are quantified on different scales precluding the use of coefficients of variation.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Based on physiological models of avian colour vision we develop an index to quantify the degree of discriminable colour variation as it can be perceived by conspecifics. A comparison of variability in ornamental and non-ornamental colours in six bird species confirmed (a) that those coloured patches that are sexually selected or act as indicators of quality show increased chromatic variability. However, we found no support for (b) that males generally show higher levels of variability than females, or (c) that sexual dichromatism per se is associated with increased variability.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We show that it is currently possible to realistically estimate variability of animal colours as perceived by them, something difficult to achieve with other traits. Increased variability of known sexually-selected/quality-indicating colours in the studied species, provides support to the predictions borne from sexual selection theory but the lack of increased overall variability in males or dimorphic colours in general indicates that sexual differences might not always be shaped by similar selective forces.
性选择饰纹的变异性增加是进化理论的一个关键假设,人们认为它是通过条件依赖来维持的。性选择的条件依赖型 handicap 模型预测:(a)与同等的非性选择性状相比,性选择的性状表现出更大的变异性,并且由于雄性通常是性选择的性别,所以(b)雄性比雌性更具变异性,以及(c)两性异形性状比单形性状更具变异性。到目前为止,这些预测仅针对度量性状进行了测试。令人惊讶的是,它们尚未针对最突出的性性状之一——鲜艳的色彩进行检验。这种遗漏源于计算上的困难:不同类型的颜色是在不同的尺度上进行量化的,这使得变异系数无法使用。
方法/主要发现:基于鸟类色觉的生理模型,我们开发了一个指数来量化可辨别颜色变异的程度,因为同种个体能够感知到这种变异。对六种鸟类的饰纹颜色和非饰纹颜色的变异性进行比较,证实了(a)那些被性选择或作为质量指标的色斑表现出更大的色度变异性。然而,我们没有找到证据支持(b)雄性通常比雌性表现出更高的变异性,或者(c)两性异色本身与变异性增加有关。
结论/意义:我们表明,目前有可能实际估计动物所感知到的颜色变异性,而这对于其他性状来说很难实现。在所研究的物种中,已知的性选择/质量指示颜色的变异性增加,为性选择理论的预测提供了支持,但雄性总体变异性或一般两性异形颜色缺乏增加表明,性别差异可能并不总是由相似的选择力量塑造的。