Xu Zhongyu
Department of Ophthalmology, Jieyang Pepole's Hospital, Jieyang 522000, China.
Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2007 Dec;23(4):247-51.
To compare with phacoemulsification, to evaluate the clinical outcomes and advantages of modified tunnel incision non-phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
One hundred and eighteen eyes of 118 cataract patients were randomly divided into two groups: phacoemulsification and foldable IOL implantation group (58 eyes) as well as modified tunnel incision non-phacoemulsification and foldable IOL implantation group (60 eyes). Intraoperative complications and postoperative visual acuity were evaluated.
There was no significant difference in intraoperative complications and postoperative visual acuity between two groups. The cost of non-phacoemulsification was less than that of the phacoemulsification surgery. The Study curve is also short in non-phaco-emulsification surgery.
Modified tunnel incision non-phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation surgery is suitable to be promoted in cataract treatment.
与超声乳化术相比较，评估改良隧道切口非超声乳化白内障摘除联合折叠式人工晶状体植入术的临床疗效及优势。
118例白内障患者的118只患眼随机分为两组：超声乳化白内障摘除联合折叠式人工晶状体植入组（58只眼）和改良隧道切口非超声乳化白内障摘除联合折叠式人工晶状体植入组（60只眼）。评估术中并发症及术后视力。
两组术中并发症及术后视力差异无统计学意义。非超声乳化术费用低于超声乳化手术，且非超声乳化手术学习曲线短。
改良隧道切口非超声乳化白内障摘除联合折叠式人工晶状体植入术适宜在白内障治疗中推广。
