• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断性研究中知情同意过程所引入的系统偏差。

Systematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study.

作者信息

Mitchell Alice M, Kline Jeffrey A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;15(3):225-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00066.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00066.x
PMID:18304052
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine population characteristics, outcomes, and reasons for unsuccessful enrollment among potential study subjects approached for written, informed consent in a minimal-risk emergency department (ED) study. The authors hypothesized that the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) would be lower among study participants and that medical acuity and refusal to provide a blood sample would be the most common reasons for nonparticipation.

METHODS

The authors requested prospective, written, informed consent for a blood sample and follow-up from consecutive ED patients undergoing evaluation for pulmonary embolism (PE) and recorded spontaneously stated reasons for refusal. VTE was diagnosed or excluded using a combination of D-dimer testing and selective computed tomography (CT) angiography of the chest with venography of the lower extremities. The primary outcome was defined by the number of CT scans positive for VTE among ED patients evaluated for PE.

RESULTS

Over 16 weeks, 260 of 287 (91%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 87 to 94%) eligible patients were approached and consent was obtained from 183 patients (64%, 95% CI = 58% to 69%). The prevalence of VTE was 6% among participants and 13% among nonparticipants (95% CI [of the difference] = 1% to 15%). The proportions of African Americans, uninsured, and Medicaid patients were significantly higher among nonparticipants. No significant differences were found in the proportions of nonparticipants who disliked or distrusted research or desired financial reimbursement, compared to those not enrolled due to medical acuity or refused a blood sample.

CONCLUSIONS

These data implicate the written, informed consent process as a significant source of bias on estimated disease prevalence.

摘要

目的

在一项低风险急诊科(ED)研究中,确定在寻求书面知情同意的潜在研究对象中,人群特征、研究结果以及未成功入组的原因。作者假设静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)在研究参与者中的患病率会更低,并且病情严重程度以及拒绝提供血样将是最常见的未参与原因。

方法

作者要求对连续接受肺栓塞(PE)评估的急诊科患者进行前瞻性书面知情同意,以获取血样并进行随访,并记录自发陈述的拒绝原因。使用D - 二聚体检测以及胸部选择性计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影结合下肢静脉造影来诊断或排除VTE。主要结局由接受PE评估的急诊科患者中VTE阳性的CT扫描数量来定义。

结果

在16周内,287名符合条件的患者中有260名(91%,95%置信区间[CI]=87%至94%)被纳入研究,183名患者(64%,95%CI = 58%至69%)获得了同意。参与者中VTE的患病率为6%,未参与者中为13%(差异的95%CI = 1%至15%)。未参与者中非洲裔美国人、未参保者和医疗补助患者的比例显著更高。与因病情严重程度未入组或拒绝提供血样的患者相比,在不喜欢或不信任研究或期望获得经济补偿的未参与者比例方面未发现显著差异。

结论

这些数据表明书面知情同意过程是估计疾病患病率时偏差的一个重要来源。

相似文献

1
Systematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study.诊断性研究中知情同意过程所引入的系统偏差。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;15(3):225-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00066.x.
2
Impact of detailed informed consent on research subjects' participation: a prospective, randomized trial.详细知情同意对研究对象参与度的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Emerg Med. 2008 Apr;34(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.06.026. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
3
Guardian availability in children evaluated in the emergency department for blunt head trauma.在急诊科接受钝性头部创伤评估的儿童中监护人的可获得性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jan;16(1):15-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00293.x. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
4
Exception from informed consent enrollment in emergency medical research: attitudes and awareness.紧急医学研究中知情同意入组的例外情况:态度与认知
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;14(2):187-91. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.08.019.
5
Global Risk Profile Verification in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism (GRIP VTE) in 5 Gulf countries.海湾地区5个国家静脉血栓栓塞症患者的全球风险概况验证(GRIP VTE)
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):289-96. doi: 10.1177/1076029608315168. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
6
The consent and prescription compliance (COPRECO) study: does obtaining consent in the emergency department affect study results in a telephone follow-up study of medication compliance?同意与处方依从性(COPRECO)研究:在急诊科获得同意是否会影响药物依从性电话随访研究的结果?
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):932-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00234.x. Epub 2008 Sep 22.
7
Record linkage research and informed consent: who consents?记录链接研究与知情同意:谁来同意?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb 12;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-18.
8
Potential impact of adjusting the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer based on pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism.基于急性肺栓塞的预检概率调整定量D-二聚体阈值的潜在影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;16(4):325-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00368.x. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
9
Evaluation of Wells score and repeated D-dimer in diagnosing venous thromboembolism.Wells评分与重复D-二聚体检测在静脉血栓栓塞症诊断中的应用评估
Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Jun;19(4):285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.08.007. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
10
Tandem measurement of D-dimer and myeloperoxidase or C-reactive protein to effectively screen for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.在急诊科串联检测D-二聚体与髓过氧化物酶或C反应蛋白以有效筛查肺栓塞。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;15(9):800-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00204.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethics of uninsured participants accessing healthcare in biomedical research: A literature review.无保险参与者在生物医学研究中获得医疗保健的伦理问题:文献综述。
Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;15(5):509-521. doi: 10.1177/1740774518792277. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
Waiver of consent in noninterventional, observational emergency research: the PROMMTT experience.非干预性、观察性急诊研究中同意的豁免:PROMMTT 经验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S3-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828fa3a0.
3
The use of delayed telephone informed consent for observational emergency medicine research is ethical and effective.
延迟电话告知同意在观察性急诊医学研究中是合乎伦理且有效的。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):403-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12117.
4
The effect of informed consent on results of a standard upper extremity intake questionnaire.知情同意对标准上肢摄入问卷结果的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Feb;38(2):366-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.10.036. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
5
Prospective study of the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy among patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism by contrast-enhanced computed tomography.前瞻性研究对比增强计算机断层扫描评估肺栓塞患者对比剂肾病的发生率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;19(6):618-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01374.x.
6
Coordination and management of multicenter clinical studies in trauma: Experience from the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) Study.创伤多中心临床研究的协调与管理:来自前瞻性观察性多中心严重创伤输血研究(PROMMTT)的经验。
Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):459-64. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.019. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
7
Antenatal consent in the SUPPORT trial: challenges, costs, and representative enrollment.SUPPORT 试验中的产前同意:挑战、成本和有代表性的入组。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e215-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3353. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
8
Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the outpatient setting.门诊患者行增强计算机断层扫描后对比剂肾病的发生率。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jan;5(1):4-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05200709. Epub 2009 Dec 3.