Suppr超能文献

Wells评分与重复D-二聚体检测在静脉血栓栓塞症诊断中的应用评估

Evaluation of Wells score and repeated D-dimer in diagnosing venous thromboembolism.

作者信息

Ljungqvist Maria, Söderberg Mårten, Moritz Per, Ahlgren Anders, Lärfars Gerd

机构信息

Dept of Internal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Jun;19(4):285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.08.007. Epub 2008 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of venous thromboembolism (VTE), i.e., deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), are common at the emergency departments. However, of those, only 15-25% actually have the disease. The aims of this study were to determine (1) if low pre-test probability (PTP) using the Wells score, together with a normal D-dimer, safely excludes VTE in outpatients and (2) if a follow-up D-dimer adds extra information.

METHODS

Patients (n=151, 68% women) with suspected VTE, a PTP below 1.5, and a D-dimer test (TinaQuant) below 0.5 mg/L were included in the study and underwent no further diagnostic investigations. Patients (n=177, 54% women) with D-dimer levels of 0.5 mg/L or higher or a PTP of 1.5 or higher were excluded. A follow-up D-dimer test was conducted 3-7 days after the initial hospital visit and further diagnostic investigations were made if test results were abnormal. Patients were studied for 3 months.

RESULTS

A follow-up D-dimer test was conducted in 101/151 cases (67%), 13/101 of which revealed elevated D-dimer levels. None of these 13 patients had persistent symptoms or was diagnosed with VTE. All 151 patients were contacted after 3 months; none of them had clinical signs of VTE. Of the 177 patients excluded, 45 (25%) were diagnosed with VTE. Of the 176/328 (151+177) patients with normal D-dimer levels, only 1 had VTE (<0.01%).

CONCLUSION

A normal PTP using the Wells score and a normal D-dimer safely excludes VTE at the emergency department. A follow-up D-dimer test adds no further information.

摘要

背景

出现提示静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)症状的患者,即深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)患者,在急诊科很常见。然而,其中只有15%-25%的患者实际患有该病。本研究的目的是确定:(1)使用Wells评分且D-二聚体正常时的低预测试概率(PTP)能否安全排除门诊患者的VTE;(2)随访D-二聚体是否能提供额外信息。

方法

本研究纳入了疑似VTE、PTP低于1.5且D-二聚体检测(TinaQuant)低于0.5mg/L的患者(n=151,68%为女性),这些患者未接受进一步的诊断检查。排除D-二聚体水平为0.5mg/L或更高或PTP为1.5或更高的患者(n=177,54%为女性)。在首次就诊后3-7天进行随访D-二聚体检测,若检测结果异常则进行进一步的诊断检查。对患者进行3个月的研究。

结果

101/151例(67%)患者进行了随访D-二聚体检测,其中13/101例D-二聚体水平升高。这13例患者均无持续症状,也未被诊断为VTE。3个月后联系了所有151例患者;他们均无VTE的临床体征。在排除的177例患者中,45例(25%)被诊断为VTE。在D-二聚体水平正常的176/328例(151+177)患者中,只有1例患有VTE(<0.01%)。

结论

使用Wells评分且D-二聚体正常可安全排除急诊科患者的VTE。随访D-二聚体检测未提供更多信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验