Huang Nicole, Shih Shu-Fang, Chang Hsing-Yi, Chou Yiing-Jenq
Institute of Public Health, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan, ROC.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb 12;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-18.
Linking computerized health insurance records with routinely collected survey data is becoming increasingly popular in health services research. However, if consent is not universal, the requirement of written informed consent may introduce a number of research biases. The participants of a national health survey in Taiwan were asked to have their questionnaire results linked to their national health insurance records. This study compares those who consented with those who refused.
A national representative sample (n = 14,611 adults) of the general adult population aged 20 years or older who participated in the Taiwan National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and who provided complete survey information were used in this study. At the end of the survey, the respondents were asked if they would give permission to access their National Health Insurance records. Information given by the interviewees in the survey was used to analyze who was more likely to consent to linkage and who wasn't.
Of the 14,611 NHIS participants, 12,911 (88%) gave consent, and 1,700 (12%) denied consent. The elderly, the illiterate, those with a lower income, and the suburban area residents were significantly more likely to deny consent. The aborigines were significantly less likely to refuse. No discrepancy in gender and self-reported health was found between individuals who consented and those who refused.
This study is the first population-based study in assessing the consent pattern in a general Asian population. Consistent with people in Western societies, in Taiwan, a typical Asian society, a high percentage of adults gave consent for their health insurance records and questionnaire results to be linked. Consenters differed significantly from non-consenters in important aspects such as age, ethnicity, and educational background. Consequently, having a high consent rate (88%) may not fully eliminate the possibility of selection bias. Researchers should take this source of bias into consideration in their study design and investigate any potential impact of this source of bias on their results.
在卫生服务研究中,将计算机化的医疗保险记录与常规收集的调查数据相链接正变得越来越普遍。然而,如果未获得普遍同意,书面知情同意的要求可能会引入一些研究偏差。台湾一项全国性健康调查的参与者被要求将其问卷结果与国民健康保险记录相链接。本研究对同意者和拒绝者进行了比较。
本研究使用了参加台湾国民健康访问调查(NHIS)且提供完整调查信息的20岁及以上成年普通人群的全国代表性样本(n = 14,611)。在调查结束时,询问受访者是否允许获取其国民健康保险记录。利用受访者在调查中提供的信息来分析谁更有可能同意链接,谁不太可能同意。
在14,611名NHIS参与者中,12,911人(88%)同意,1,700人(12%)拒绝同意。老年人、文盲、低收入者和郊区居民明显更有可能拒绝同意。原住民拒绝的可能性明显较小。同意者和拒绝者在性别和自我报告的健康状况方面没有差异。
本研究是第一项基于人群评估一般亚洲人群同意模式的研究。与西方社会的人群一致,在典型的亚洲社会台湾,很大比例的成年人同意将其健康保险记录和问卷结果相链接。同意者和不同意者在年龄、种族和教育背景等重要方面存在显著差异。因此,高同意率(88%)可能无法完全消除选择偏差的可能性。研究人员在研究设计中应考虑到这种偏差来源,并调查这种偏差来源对其结果的任何潜在影响。