Suppr超能文献

问题形式对抵制误导性事后信息的影响以及催眠期间发生事件的自我报告。

The effect of question format on resistance to misleading postevent information and self-reports of events occurring during hypnosis.

作者信息

Eisen Mitchell L, Oustinovskaya Maka, Kistorian Rose, Morgan Danielle Y, Mickes Laura

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles, California 90032, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2008 Apr;56(2):198-213. doi: 10.1080/00207140701672946.

Abstract

Participants were administered a standard tape-recorded version of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A) and then a modified version of the HGSHS:A response booklet that asked each participant to report which suggested behaviors they performed during the procedures. These response booklets were altered to include 3 additional suggestions not offered during the hypnotic procedures. Half the participants were administered the questions in the response booklet in the standard format ("I performed the suggested behavior" versus "I did not perform the suggested behavior"). The remaining participants were offered a third alternative to each question ("I do not remember this occurring"). As predicted, participants offered the 3rd alternative were significantly less likely to report performing actions that were never suggested during the procedures. Further, these participants reported performing fewer suggested behaviors (i.e., reported passing fewer of the true Harvard items) than participants in the standard 2-alternative condition.

摘要

参与者接受了哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A版(HGSHS:A)的标准录音版本,然后是HGSHS:A应答手册的修改版,该手册要求每位参与者报告他们在程序中执行了哪些暗示行为。这些应答手册被修改为包含3条在催眠程序中未给出的额外暗示。一半的参与者以标准格式(“我执行了暗示行为”与“我没有执行暗示行为”)回答应答手册中的问题。其余参与者在每个问题上有第三种选择(“我不记得发生过这件事”)。正如预测的那样,有第三种选择的参与者报告执行在程序中从未被暗示过的行为的可能性显著降低。此外,与标准的二选一条件下的参与者相比,这些参与者报告执行的暗示行为更少(即报告通过的真正哈佛项目更少)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验