Suppr超能文献

衡量监狱内的受害情况:质疑相关问题。

Measuring victimization inside prisons: questioning the questions.

作者信息

Wolff Nancy, Bachman Ronet

机构信息

Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2008 Oct;23(10):1343-62. doi: 10.1177/0886260508314301. Epub 2008 Feb 28.

Abstract

Violence and victimization inside the prison setting are accepted as facts, although the facts about their prevalence remain uncertain. Variation in the methods used to estimate rates of sexual and physical victimization contribute to the wide range in estimates appearing in the prison literature. This article focuses on the questions used in the prison victimization literature to elicit information on victimization from inmates, compared to questions used in the general victimization literature. The questions used in the National Violence Against Women and Men Surveys are used to estimate sexual and physical victimization rates for an entire prison system. Rates of victimization were found to vary significantly by specificity of the question, definition of perpetrator, and clustering of behaviors. Facts about victimization inside prison will become more certain when the methodology becomes more standardized and consistent with definitions of victimization.

摘要

监狱环境中的暴力和受害情况被视为事实,尽管其普遍程度的实际情况仍不明确。用于估计性侵害和身体侵害发生率的方法存在差异,这导致监狱文献中出现的估计范围很广。与一般受害情况文献中使用的问题相比,本文重点关注监狱受害情况文献中用于从囚犯那里获取受害信息的问题。全国妇女和男子遭受暴力调查中使用的问题被用来估计整个监狱系统的性侵害和身体侵害发生率。研究发现,受害率因问题的具体程度、犯罪者的定义以及行为的聚类而有显著差异。当方法更加标准化且与受害情况的定义保持一致时,监狱内受害情况的实际情况将变得更加明确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验