Toit N Du, Bezensek B, Dixon P M
Division of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG.
Vet Rec. 2008 Mar 1;162(9):272-5. doi: 10.1136/vr.162.9.272.
The microhardness of the enamel, primary dentine and regular secondary dentine of seven donkey and six horse incisors was determined with a Knoop indenter at the subocclusal and mid-tooth level. The mean microhardnesses of the donkey incisor enamel, primary dentine and secondary dentine were 264.6 63.00 and 53.6 Knoop Hardness Number, respectively. There was no significant difference between the microhardness of the enamel and primary dentine on the incisors of the donkeys and horses, but the microhardness of the regular secondary dentine of the donkeys' incisors at the mid-tooth level was slightly but significantly less than that of the horses. There was also a difference in the microhardness of the secondary dentine between the subocclusal and mid-tooth levels in both donkey and horse incisors.
使用努氏压头在咬合面以下和牙冠中部水平测定了7颗驴和6颗马切牙的牙釉质、原发性牙本质和规则继发性牙本质的显微硬度。驴切牙的牙釉质、原发性牙本质和继发性牙本质的平均显微硬度分别为264.6、63.00和53.6努氏硬度值。驴和马切牙的牙釉质和原发性牙本质的显微硬度之间没有显著差异,但驴切牙牙冠中部水平的规则继发性牙本质的显微硬度略低于马,且差异显著。驴和马切牙的咬合面以下和牙冠中部水平的继发性牙本质的显微硬度也存在差异。