• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

配体特异性评分函数:对接解决方案的改进排名

Ligand-specific scoring functions: improved ranking of docking solutions.

作者信息

Pyrkov T V, Priestle J P, Jacoby E, Efremov R G

机构信息

MM Shemyakin & Yu.A. Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;19(1-2):91-9. doi: 10.1080/10629360701844092.

DOI:10.1080/10629360701844092
PMID:18311637
Abstract

Molecular docking is a powerful computational method that has been widely used in many biomolecular studies to predict geometry of a protein-ligand complex. However, while its conformational search algorithms are usually able to generate correct conformation of a ligand in the binding site, the scoring methods often fail to discriminate it among many false variants. We propose to treat this problem by applying more precise ligand-specific scoring filters to re-rank docking solutions. In this way specific features of interactions between protein and different types of compounds can be implicitly taken into account. New scoring functions were constructed including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic and hydrophilic complementarity terms. These scoring functions also discriminate ligands by the size of the molecule, the total hydrophobicity, and the number of peptide bonds for peptide ligands. Weighting coefficients of the scoring functions were adjusted using a training set of 60 protein-ligand complexes. The proposed method was then tested on the results of docking obtained for an additional 70 complexes. In both cases the success rate was 5-8% better compared to the standard functions implemented in popular docking software.

摘要

分子对接是一种强大的计算方法,已广泛应用于许多生物分子研究中,以预测蛋白质-配体复合物的几何结构。然而,虽然其构象搜索算法通常能够在结合位点生成配体的正确构象,但评分方法往往无法在众多错误变体中区分出正确的构象。我们建议通过应用更精确的配体特异性评分过滤器对对接解决方案进行重新排序来解决这个问题。通过这种方式,可以隐式地考虑蛋白质与不同类型化合物之间相互作用的特定特征。构建了新的评分函数,包括氢键、疏水和亲水互补项。这些评分函数还根据分子大小、总疏水性以及肽配体的肽键数量来区分配体。使用包含60个蛋白质-配体复合物的训练集调整评分函数的加权系数。然后在所获得的另外70个复合物的对接结果上测试了所提出的方法。在这两种情况下,与流行对接软件中实现的标准函数相比,成功率提高了5-8%。

相似文献

1
Ligand-specific scoring functions: improved ranking of docking solutions.配体特异性评分函数:对接解决方案的改进排名
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;19(1-2):91-9. doi: 10.1080/10629360701844092.
2
Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions.ATP与蛋白质结合中疏水性质的互补性:一种对对接解决方案进行排序的新准则。
Proteins. 2007 Feb 1;66(2):388-98. doi: 10.1002/prot.21122.
3
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.在多样化测试集上对评分函数的比较评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1021/ci9000053.
4
Rational automatic search method for stable docking models of protein and ligand.蛋白质与配体稳定对接模型的合理自动搜索方法
J Mol Biol. 1994 Oct 21;243(2):310-26. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1656.
5
A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.对接程序和评分函数的批判性评估。
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 5;49(20):5912-31. doi: 10.1021/jm050362n.
6
Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.11种分子对接评分函数的比较评估
J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 5;46(12):2287-303. doi: 10.1021/jm0203783.
7
A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.当前对接和评分方法在药物相关系统上的详细比较。
Proteins. 2004 Aug 1;56(2):235-49. doi: 10.1002/prot.20088.
8
Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.评估蛋白质-配体相互作用的评分函数。
J Med Chem. 2004 Jun 3;47(12):3032-47. doi: 10.1021/jm030489h.
9
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.对接原理:搜索算法概述及评分函数指南
Proteins. 2002 Jun 1;47(4):409-43. doi: 10.1002/prot.10115.
10
Steering protein-ligand docking with quantitative NMR chemical shift perturbations.利用定量核磁共振化学位移扰动进行导向蛋白-配体对接。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Oct;49(10):2260-71. doi: 10.1021/ci900188r.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing How Residual Errors of Scoring Functions Correlate to Ligand Structural Features.评估打分函数的残差误差如何与配体结构特征相关联。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;23(23):15018. doi: 10.3390/ijms232315018.
2
Synthesis and Antiplatelet Activity Evaluation of a Group of Novel Ethyl Acetoacetate Phenylhydrazone Derivatives.一组新型乙酰乙酸乙酯苯腙衍生物的合成及抗血小板活性评价
Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Spring;20(2):307-315. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.114123.14674.
3
Modular organization of α-toxins from scorpion venom mirrors domain structure of their targets, sodium channels.
蝎毒α-毒素的模块化组织反映了其靶标(钠离子通道)的结构域结构。
J Biol Chem. 2013 Jun 28;288(26):19014-27. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.431650. Epub 2013 May 1.